The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing.
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE--To evaluate the effectiveness of community clinics for leg ulcers. DESIGN--All patients with leg ulceration were invited to community clinics that offered treatment developed in a hospital research clinic. Patients without serious arterial disease (Doppler ankle/brachial index > 0.8) were treated with a high compression bandage of four layers. SETTING--Six community clinics held in health centres in Riverside District Health Authority supported by the Charing Cross vascular surgical service. PATIENTS--All patients referred to the community services with leg ulceration, irrespective of cause and duration of ulceration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Time to complete healing by the life table method. RESULTS--550 ulcerated legs were seen in 475 patients of mean (SD) age 73.8 (11.9) years. There were 477 venous ulcers of median size 4.2 cm2 (range 0.1-117 cm2), 128 being larger than 10 cm2. These ulcers had been present for a median of three months (range one week to 63 years) with 150 present for over one year. Four layer bandaging in the community clinics achieved complete healing in 318 (69%) venous ulcers by 12 weeks and 375 (83%) by 24 weeks. There were 56 patients with an ankle/brachial arterial pressure index < 0.8, indicating arterial disease. The 50 patients with pressure index < 0.8 > 0.5 were treated with reduced compression, and 24 (56%) healed by 12 weeks and 31 (75%) by 24 weeks. The figures for overall healing for all leg ulcers were 351/550 (67%) at 12 weeks and 417/550 (81%) at 24 weeks, compared with only 11/51 (22%) at 12 weeks before the community clinics were set up. CONCLUSIONS--Community clinics for venous ulcers offer an effective means of achieving healing in most patients with leg ulcers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management
Schultz, G. S., Sibbald, R. G., Falanga, V., Ayello, E. A., Dowsett, C., Harding, K., Romanelli, M., Stacey, M. C., Teot, L., & Vanscheidt, W. (2003) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.11.s2.1.x · Cited by 1,434
Investigation of Chronic Venous Insufficiency: A Consensus Statement
Nicolaides, A. N. (2000) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.102.20.e126 · Cited by 945
Barwell, J. R., Davies, C. E., Deacon, J., Harvey, K., Minor, J., Sassano, A., Taylor, M., Usher, J., Wakely, C., Earnshaw, J. J., et al. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16353-8 · Cited by 630
Bacteriophage trigger antiviral immunity and prevent clearance of bacterial infection
Sweere, J. M., Van Belleghem, J. D., Ishak, H., Bach, M. S., Popescu, M., Sunkari, V., Kaber, G., Manasherob, R., Suh, G. A., Cao, X., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat9691 · Cited by 478
Trends in the incidence of venous stasis syndrome and venous ulcer: A 25-year population-based study
Heit, J. A., Rooke, T. W., Silverstein, M. D., Mohr, D. N., Lohse, C. M., Petterson, T. M., O'Fallon, W. M., & Melton, L. J. (2001) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1067/mva.2001.113308 · Cited by 263
Metadata
- Authors
- Moffatt, C. J., Franks, P. J., Oldroyd, M., Bosanquet, N., Brown, P., Greenhalgh, R. M., & McCollum, C. N.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1992-12-05
- Volume
- 305
- Issue
- 6866
- Pages
- 1389-1392
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2015735401
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1389
- The paper
- Moffatt, C. J., Franks, P. J., Oldroyd, M., Bosanquet, N., Brown, P., Greenhalgh, R. M., & McCollum, C. N. (1992). Community clinics for leg ulcers and impact on healing. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6866.1389
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.