The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To determine the risks of hospitalisation for bleeding peptic ulcer with the current prophylactic aspirin regimens of 300 mg daily or less. Design : A case-control study with hospital and community controls. Setting : Hospitals in Glasgow, Newcastle, Nottingham, Oxford, and Portsmouth. Subjects : 1121 patients with gastric or duodenal ulcer bleeding matched with hospital and community controls. Results : 144 (12.8%) cases had been regular users of aspirin (taken at least five days a week for at least the previous month) compared with 101 (9.0%) hospital and 77 (7.8%) community controls. Odds ratios were raised for all doses of aspirin taken, whether compared with hospital or community controls (compared with combined controls: 75 mg, 2.3 (95% confidence interval 1.2 to 4.4); 150 mg, 3.2 (1.7 to 6.5); 300 mg, 3.9 (2.5 to 6.3)). Results were not explained by confounding influences of age, sex, prior ulcer history or dyspepsia, or concurrent non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Risks seemed particularly high in patients who took non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs concurrently. Conclusion : No conventionally used prophylactic aspirin regimen seems free of the risk of peptic ulcer complications. Key messages: Key messages This finding applies to doses in common use of 75, 150, and 300 mg daily Despite these results, overall benefits of treatment are likely considerably to outweigh possible risks
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Diener, H.-C., Bogousslavsky, J., Brass, L. M., Cimminiello, C., Csiba, L., Kaste, M., Leys, D., Matias-Guiu, J., & Rupprecht, H.-J. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16721-4 · Cited by 2,275
Patrono, C., Coller, B., Dalen, J. E., Fitz Gerald, G. A., Fuster, V., Gent, M., Hirsh, J., & Roth, G. (2001) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.119.1_suppl.39s · Cited by 963
Risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage with long term use of aspirin: meta-analysis
Derry, S. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1183 · Cited by 677
Second Asia–Pacific Consensus Guidelines for Helicobacter pylori infection
Fock, K. M., Katelaris, P., Sugano, K., Ang, T. L., Hunt, R., Talley, N. J., Lam, S. K., Xiao, S., Tan, H. J., Wu, C., et al. (2009) · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1746.2009.05982.x · Cited by 554
Weitz, J. I., Eikelboom, J. W., & Samama, M. M. (2012) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.11-2294 · Cited by 527
Metadata
- Authors
- Weil, J., Colin-Jones, D., Langman, M., Lawson, D., Logan, R., Murphy, M., Rawlins, M., Vessey, M., & Wainwright, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-04-01
- Volume
- 310
- Issue
- 6983
- Pages
- 827-830
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2073714032
- Cited by
- 568
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.310.6983.827
- The paper
- Weil, J., Colin-Jones, D., Langman, M., Lawson, D., Logan, R., Murphy, M., Rawlins, M., Vessey, M., & Wainwright, P. (1995). Prophylactic aspirin and risk of peptic ulcer bleeding. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.310.6983.827
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.