The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To determine effectiveness and adverse effects of anticonvulsant drugs in management of pain. Design : Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of anticonvulsants for acute, chronic, or cancer pain identified by using Medline, by hand searching, by searching reference lists, and by contacting investigators. Subjects : Between 1966 and February 1994, 37 reports were found; 20 reports, of four anticonvulsants, were eligible. Main outcome measures : Numbers needed to treat were calculated for effectiveness, adverse effects, and drug related withdrawal from study. Results : The only placebo controlled study in acute pain found no analgesic effect of sodium valproate. For treating trigeminal neuralgia, carbamazepine had a combined number needed to treat of 2.6 for effectiveness, 3.4 for adverse effects, and 24 for severe effects (withdrawal from study). For treating diabetic neuropathy, anticonvulsants had a combined number needed to treat of 2.5 for effectiveness, 3.1 for adverse effects, and 20 for severe effects. For migraine prophylaxis, anticonvulsants had a combined number needed to treat of 1.6 for effectiveness, 2.4 for adverse effects, and 39 for severe effects. Phenytoin had no effect on the irritable bowel syndrome, and carbamazepine had little effect on pain after stroke. Clonazepam was effective in one study for temporomandibular joint dysfunction. No study compared one anticonvulsant with another. Conclusions : Anticonvulsants were effective for trigeminal neuralgia and diabetic neuropathy and for migraine prophylaxis. Minor adverse effects occurred as often as benefit.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The number needed to treat: a clinically useful measure of treatment effect
Cook, R. J., & Sackett, D. L. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.310.6977.452 · Cited by 1,885
Cited by
Farrar, J. T., Young, J. P., LaMoreaux, L., Werth, J. L., & Poole, M. R. (2001) · Pain · doi:10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 · Cited by 5,808
Boulton, A. J. M., Malik, R. A., Arezzo, J. C., & Sosenko, J. M. (2004) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/diacare.27.6.1458 · Cited by 913
AAN-EFNS guidelines on trigeminal neuralgia management
Cruccu, G., Gronseth, G., Alksne, J., Argoff, C., Brainin, M., Burchiel, K., Nurmikko, T., & Zakrzewska, J. M. (2008) · European Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02185.x · Cited by 726
Gabapentin for chronic neuropathic pain in adults
Wiffen, P. J., Derry, S., Bell, R. F., Rice, A. S., Tölle, T. R., Phillips, T., & Moore, R. A. (2017) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007938.pub4 · Cited by 561
Self-citationComplex Regional Pain Syndrome: Practical Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines, 4th Edition
Harden, R. N., Oaklander, A. L., Burton, A. W., Perez, R. S. G. M., Richardson, K., Swan, M., Barthel, J., Costa, B., Graciosa, J. R., & Bruehl, S. (2013) · Pain Medicine · doi:10.1111/pme.12033 · Cited by 534
Metadata
- Authors
- McQuay, H., Carroll, D., Jadad, A. R., Wiffen, P., & Moore, A.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1995-10-21
- Volume
- 311
- Issue
- 7012
- Pages
- 1047-1052
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2081887464
- Cited by
- 713
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 2.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1047
- The paper
- McQuay, H., Carroll, D., Jadad, A. R., Wiffen, P., & Moore, A. (1995). Anticonvulsant drugs for management of pain: a systematic review. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.311.7012.1047
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.