Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 303

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Air pollution and daily mortality in London: 1987-92

Open access
Anderson, H Ross, de Leon, Antonio Ponce, Bland, J Martin, Bower, Jonathan S, Strachan, David P·1996·BMJ

Abstract

Objective : To investigate whether outdoor air pollution levels in London influence daily mortality. Design : Poisson regression analysis of daily counts of deaths, with adjustment for effects of secular trend, seasonal and other cyclical factors, day of the week, holidays, influenza epidemic, temperature, humidity, and autocorrelation, from April 1987 to March 1992. Pollution variables were particles (black smoke), sulphur dioxide, ozone, and nitrogen dioxide, lagged 0-3 days. Setting : Greater London. Outcome measures : Relative risk of death from all causes (excluding accidents), respiratory disease, and cardiovascular disease. Results : Ozone levels (same day) were associated with a significant increase in all cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality; the effects were greater in the warm season (April to September) and were independent of the effects of other pollutants. In the warm season an increase of the eight hour ozone concentration from the 10th to the 90th centile of the seasonal range (7-36 ppb) was associated with an increase of 3.5% (95% confidence interval 1.7 to 5.3), 3.6% (1.04 to 6.1), and 5.4% (0.4 to 10.7) in all cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory mortality respectively. Black smoke concentrations on the previous day were significantly associated with all cause mortality, and this effect was also greater in the warm season and was independent of the effects of other pollutants. For black smoke an increase from the 10th to 90th centile in the warm season (7-19 µg/m 3 ) was associated with an increase of 2.5% (0.9 to 4.1) in all cause mortality. Significant but smaller and less consistent effects were also observed for nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide. Conclusion : Daily variations in air pollution within the range currently occurring in London may have an adverse effect on daily mortality. Key messages: Evidence from other countries suggests that similar levels of pollution may be associated with short term health effects This study suggests that air pollution due to particles and ozone may be associated with increased daily mortality in London The evidence is less convincing for nitrogen dioxide and sulphur dioxide It would be prudent to assume that these associations are causal and to reduce air pollution levels with the help of appropriate abate- ment policies

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.665

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 303

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, H. R., de Leon, A. P., Bland, J. M., Bower, J. S., & Strachan, D. P.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-03-16
Volume
312
Issue
7032
Pages
665-669
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2077273346
Cited by
303
References
1
FWCI
20.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Air pollution and daily mortality in London: 1987-92. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.312.7032.665
The paper
Anderson, H. R., de Leon, A. P., Bland, J. M., Bower, J. S., & Strachan, D. P. (1996). Air pollution and daily mortality in London: 1987-92. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7032.665

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.