Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 313

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years

Open access
Tariq, S M, Stevens, M, Matthews, S, Ridout, S, Twiselton, R, Hide, D W·1996·BMJ

Abstract

Abstract Objective: To determine the prevalence of sensitisation to peanuts and tree nuts in all children born during one year in one geographical area. Design: Birth cohort study with structured review at ages 1, 2, and 4 years. Setting: All children born on the Isle of Wight between January 1989 and February 1990. Subjects: Of 1456 children originally included, 1218 were reviewed at age 4 years. Of these, 981 had skin prick tests. Main outcome measures: Positive skin test results, clinical atopic disease, and risk factors for the development of atopy. Results: 15 of 1218 (1.2%) children were sensitised to peanuts or tree nuts (13 to peanuts). Six had had allergic reactions to peanuts (0.5% of the population), one to hazelnuts, and one to cashew nuts; three had had anaphylactic reactions. Seven children had positive skin test results or detectable IgE to peanuts without clinical symptoms. Two children who reacted to peanut in infancy had lost their sensitivity by 4 years. Family history of atopy, allergy to egg (odds ratio 9.9, 95% confidence interval 2.1 to 47.9, and eczema (7.3, 2.1 to 26.1) were important predictors for peanut allergy. Conclusions: IgE mediated allergy to peanuts is common in early childhood. In many the allergy persists but a minority may develop tolerance. Key messages Key messages This study suggests that 1 in 200 children could have reactions to peanuts and tree nuts by the age of 4 years and a similar number could have asymp- tomatic sensitisation Children with allergy to peanuts invariably have another atopic disorder such as asthma, eczema, or rhinitis Sensitisation to peanuts and tree nuts may coexist

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.313.7056.514

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 313

Metadata

Authors
Tariq, S. M., Stevens, M., Matthews, S., Ridout, S., Twiselton, R., & Hide, D. W.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1996-08-31
Volume
313
Issue
7056
Pages
514-517
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1970848829
Cited by
313
References
1
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.313.7056.514
The paper
Tariq, S. M., Stevens, M., Matthews, S., Ridout, S., Twiselton, R., & Hide, D. W. (1996). Cohort study of peanut and tree nut sensitisation by age of 4 years. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7056.514

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.