The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What clinical information do doctors need?
Open accessAbstract
Summary points: Doctors use some two million pieces of information to manage patients, but little research has been done on the information needs that arise while treating patients Textbooks, journals, and other existing information tools are not adequate for answering the questions that arise: textbooks are out of date, and “the signal to noise” ratio of journals is too low for them to be useful in daily practice Computer systems that have been developed to help doctors are not widely used—perhaps because they have not been developed to meet doctors' information needs When doctors see patients they usually generate at least one question; more questions arise than the doctors seem to recognise Most of the questions concern treatment Many of the questions are highly complex, simultaneously asking about individual patients and particular areas of medical knowledge Often doctors are asking not simply for information but for support, guidance, affirmation, and feedback Many of the questions go unanswered, but most could be answered; it is, however, time consuming and expensive to answer them Doctors are most likely to seek answers to these questions from other doctors The best information sources provide relevant, valid material that can be accessed quickly and with minimal effort New information tools are needed: they are likely to be electronic, portable, fast, easy to use, connected to both a large valid database of medical knowledge and the patient record, and a servant of patients as well as doctors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Poissant, L. (2005) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1197/jamia.m1700 · Cited by 901
What can natural language processing do for clinical decision support?
Demner-Fushman, D., Chapman, W. W., & McDonald, C. J. (2009) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2009.08.007 · Cited by 688
Analysis of questions asked by family doctors regarding patient care
Ely, J. W., Osheroff, J. A., Ebell, M. H., Bergus, G. R., Levy, B. T., Chambliss, M. L., & Evans, E. R. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7206.358 · Cited by 522
Formulating Questions and Locating Primary Studies for Inclusion in Systematic Reviews
Counsell, C. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-127-5-199709010-00008 · Cited by 505
Missing Clinical Information During Primary Care Visits
Smith, P. C. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.5.565 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Smith, R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-10-26
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 7064
- Pages
- 1062-1068
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2059616669
- Cited by
- 587
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 76.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What clinical information do doctors need? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1062
- The paper
- Smith, R. (1996). What clinical information do doctors need? BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7064.1062
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.