The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Psychological rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: multicentre randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To evaluate rehabilitation after myocardial infarction. Design : Randomised controlled trial of rehabilitation in unselected myocardial infarction patients in six centres, baseline data being collected on admission and by structured interview (of patients and spouses) shortly after discharge and outcome being assessed by structured interview at six months and clinical examination at 12 months. Setting : Six district general hospitals. Subjects : All 2328 eligible patients admitted over two years with confirmed myocardial infarction and discharged home within 28 days. Interventions : Rehabilitation programmes comprising psychological therapy, counselling, relaxation training, and stress management training over seven weekly group outpatient sessions for patients and spouses. Main outcome measures : Anxiety, depression, quality of life, morbidity, use of medication, and mortality. Results : At six months there were no significant differences between rehabilitation patients and controls in reported anxiety (prevalence 33%) or depression (19%). Rehabilitation patients reported a lower frequency of angina (median three versus four episodes a week), medication, and physical activity. At 12 months there were no differences in clinical complications, clinical sequelae, or mortality. Conclusions : Rehabilitation programmes based on psychological therapy, counselling, relaxation training, and stress management seem to offer little objective benefit to patients who have experienced myocardial infarction compared with previous reports of smaller trials. Key messages: In this series there were no important differences by age, sex, hospital, or baseline anxiety or depression At six months the prevalence rates of clinical anxiety and depression remained high (33% and 19% respectively) Patients and spouses rated programmes highly, which suggests a “quality of care” role for rehabilitation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., & Kaplan, J. (1999) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.99.16.2192 · Cited by 2,846
The Relationship of Depression to Cardiovascular Disease: Epidemiology, Biology, and Treatment
Musselman, D. L., Evans, D. L., & Nemeroff, C. B. (1998) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.55.7.580 · Cited by 1,532
Stress and cardiovascular disease
Steptoe, A., & Kivimäki, M. (2012) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/nrcardio.2012.45 · Cited by 1,321
The epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of psychosocial risk factors in cardiac practice
Rozanski, A., Blumenthal, J. A., Davidson, K. W., Saab, P. G., & Kubzansky, L. (2005) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2004.12.005 · Cited by 1,238
Meta-analysis: secondary prevention programs for patients with coronary artery disease
Clark, A. M., Hartling, L., Vandermeer, B., & McAlister, F. A. (2005) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-143-9-200511010-00010 · Cited by 979
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, D. A., & West, R. R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1996-12-14
- Volume
- 313
- Issue
- 7071
- Pages
- 1517-1521
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2036636602
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: multicentre randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1517
- The paper
- Jones, D. A., & West, R. R. (1996). Psychological rehabilitation after myocardial infarction: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7071.1517
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.