Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 201

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994

Open access
Tin, Win, Wariyar, Unni, Hey, Edmund·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation. Design: A prospective, collaborative, population based survey. Setting: The former Northern Regional Health Authority. Subjects: All the births between 1983 and 1994 at 22 to 27 completed weeks' gestation to women normally resident in the region. Main outcome measures: Miscarriage, stillbirth, death in the first year of life, and disability in survivors. Results: There were 479 070 registered births in the study period. No baby of 22 weeks' gestation survived; only eight (4%) of the 197 babies of 23 weeks who were alive at the onset of labour survived for a year–a proportion that did not change during the study period. Survival among other babies of less than 28 weeks improved progressively between 1983-6 and 1991-4, but administration of artificial surfactant to babies requiring ventilation from mid-1990 was associated with further improvement in survival only in those over 25 weeks' gestation. Babies of 24 weeks required three times as much high dependency care per survivor as babies of 27 weeks (76 v 26 days). The rate of severe disability in the one year survivors of less than 26 weeks' gestation (30/123; 24%) was similar to that seen in the sampled survivors of 26 and 27 weeks (29/108; 27%); the proportion disabled did not change significantly during the study period. All the children born in 1983, 1987, and 1991 were later reassessed in greater detail: 10% (13/136) seemed destined for a continuing life of total dependency. Conclusions: Gestation, if accurately assessed, can give a woman facing very preterm delivery a clear indication of the prognosis for her baby and help her judge the appropriateness of accepting obstetric intervention and sustained perinatal support. Key messages: Survival in babies of 24-27 completed weeks of gestation has improved in the past 12 years The proportion of survivors with severe disability (25%) has not changed The survival (viability) of babies born before 24 weeks' gestation (about 4%) has not changed, and most survivors are severely disabled One in 10 of all survivors has a disability so profound that he or she is never likely to become independently mobile or to communicate effectively with others Gestation, if accurately assessed, can help women facing very preterm delivery (and their attendants) to assess the likely prognosis for the baby at the onset of labour

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.314.7074.107

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 201

Metadata

Authors
Tin, W., Wariyar, U., & Hey, E.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-01-11
Volume
314
Issue
7074
Pages
107
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W1522737559
Cited by
201
References
0
FWCI
19.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.314.7074.107
The paper
Tin, W., Wariyar, U., & Hey, E. (1997). Changing prognosis for babies of less than 28 weeks' gestation in the north of England between 1983 and 1994. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7074.107

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.