Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 406

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice

Open access
Everett, Christopher·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the miscarriage rate in a cohort of pregnant women and the final outcome of pregnancy. Design: Two year prospective community study. Setting: Women registered with four semirural practices at one health centre. Subjects: 626 pregnant women from a population 21 448, 5140 of whom were women aged 15-44 years. Main outcome measures: Vaginal bleeding and outcome of pregnancy. Results: 76 of the 89 women with an unwanted pregnancy requested a termination. In the 550 ongoing pregnancies bleeding occurred before the 20th week in 117 (21%), and 67 (12%) ended in miscarriage. The risk of miscarriage was not significantly increased after a miscarriage in the previous pregnancy (11 (15%) women had miscarriage v 55 (12%) women who had not had miscarriage) who had previously had a live birth). Of the 117 women with bleeding, 64 were not admitted to hospital by the general practitioner; 42 of these women had an ultrasound examination at the health centre and 19 subsequently miscarried at home. In hospital 41 of 46 women who miscarried had evacuation of the uterus. Conclusions: Bleeding occurred in one fifth of recognised pregnancies before the 20th week and over half of these miscarried. Treatment of women with miscarriage at home means current statistics on miscarriage in Britain are missing many cases. Key messages: No national statistics for Britain are published on miscarriages Extrapolations from this survey indicate that in 1993 there may have been 70 000-90 000 miscarriages in England and Wales Bleeding in early pregnancy is followed by a live birth in about half the affected pregnancies At least a quarter of all miscarriages were treated at home by general practitioners and would therefore not be recorded in any published statistics Women who had had a miscarriage did not have a significantly higher chance of a second consecutive miscarriage

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.315.7099.32

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 406

Metadata

Authors
Everett, C.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-07-05
Volume
315
Issue
7099
Pages
32-34
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2016096381
Cited by
406
References
11
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.315.7099.32
The paper
Everett, C. (1997). Incidence and outcome of bleeding before the 20th week of pregnancy: prospective study from general practice. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7099.32

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.