The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To estimate the risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke. Design: Analysis of 37 published epidemiological studies of the risk of lung cancer (4626 cases) in non-smokers who did and did not live with a smoker. The risk estimate was compared with that from linear extrapolation of the risk in smokers using seven studies of biochemical markers of tobacco smoke intake. Main outcome measure: Relative risk of lung cancer in lifelong non-smokers according to whether the spouse currently smoked or had never smoked. Results: The excess risk of lung cancer was 24% (95% confidence interval 13% to 36%) in non-smokers who lived with a smoker (P<0.001). Adjustment for the effects of bias (positive and negative) and dietary confounding had little overall effect; the adjusted excess risk was 26% (7% to 47%). The dose-response relation of the risk of lung cancer with both the number of cigarettes smoked by the spouse and the duration of exposure was significant. The excess risk derived by linear extrapolation from that in smokers was 19%, similar to the direct estimate of 26%. Conclusion: The epidemiological and biochemical evidence on exposure to environmental tobacco smoke, with the supporting evidence of tobacco specific carcinogens in the blood and urine of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke, provides compelling confirmation that breathing other people's tobacco smoke is a cause of lung cancer. Key messages: A woman who has never smoked has an estimated 24% greater risk of lung cancer if she lives with a smoker Neither bias nor confounding accounted for the association There is a dose-response relation between a non-smoker's risk of lung cancer and the number of cigarettes and years of exposure to the smoker The increased risk was consistent with that expected from extrapolation of the risk in smokers using biochemical markers Tobacco specific carcinogens are found in the blood and urine of non-smokers exposed to environmental tobacco smoke All the available evidence confirms that exposure to environmental tobacco smoke causes lung cancer
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
Cited by
The biology and management of non-small cell lung cancer
Herbst, R. S., Morgensztern, D., & Boshoff, C. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature25183 · Cited by 4,891
Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences
Thornton, A. (2000) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/s0895-4356(99)00161-4 · Cited by 1,291
Environmental tobacco smoke exposure and ischaemic heart disease: an evaluation of the evidence
Law, M. R., Morris, J. K., & Wald, N. J. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7114.973 · Cited by 604
Self-citationValavanidis, A., Vlachogianni, T., & Fiotakis, K. (2009) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph6020445 · Cited by 519
“Passive smoking (or environmental tobacco smoke, ETS) has been proved to be a health hazard for non-smokers and its burden of major lung diseases [15-17].”
BackgroundMeta-analysis, funnel plots and sensitivity analysis
Copas, J. (2000) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/1.3.247 · Cited by 503
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackshaw, A. K., Law, M. R., & Wald, N. J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1997-10-18
- Volume
- 315
- Issue
- 7114
- Pages
- 980-988
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2067485283
- Cited by
- 735
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.315.7114.980
- The paper
- Hackshaw, A. K., Law, M. R., & Wald, N. J. (1997). The accumulated evidence on lung cancer and environmental tobacco smoke. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7114.980
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.