Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 229

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomised controlled trial to evaluate early discharge scheme for patients with stroke

Open access
Rudd, Anthony G, Wolfe, Charles D A, Tilling, Kate, Beech, Roger·1997·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess the clinical effectiveness of an early discharge policy for patients with stroke by using a community based rehabilitation team. Design: Randomised controlled trial to compare conventional care with an early discharge policy. Setting: Two teaching hospitals in inner London. Subjects: 331 medically stable patients with stroke (mean age 71) who lived alone and were able to transfer independently or who lived with a resident carer and were able to transfer with help. Interventions: 167 patients received specialist community rehabilitation for up to 3 months after randomisation. 164 patients continued with conventional hospital and community care. Main outcome measures: Barthel score at 12 months. Secondary outcomes measured impairment with motoricity index, minimental state examination, and Frenchay aphasia screening test; disability with the Rivermead activity of daily living scales, hospital anxiety and depression scale, and 5 m walk; handicap with the Nottingham health profile; carer stress with caregiver strain index and patient and carer satisfaction. The main process measure was length of stay after randomisation. Results: One year after randomisation no significant differences in clinical outcomes were found apart from increased satisfaction with hospital care in the community therapy group. Length of stay after randomisation in the community therapy group was significantly reduced (12 v 18 days; P<0.0001). Patients with impairments were more likely to receive treatment in the community therapy group. Conclusions: Early discharge with specialist community rehabilitation after stroke is feasible, as clinically effective as conventional care, and acceptable to patients. Considerable reductions in use of hospital beds are achievable. Key messages: Early discharge from hospital after stroke with specialist rehabilitation at home is feasible without an increase in readmission rates or stress to carers This randomised controlled trial shows this method to be as effective as conventional care when assessed with a range of measures of impairment, disability, handicap, carer stress, and patient and carer satisfaction at 1 year Significant reductions in bed usage can be achieved by the provision of a community rehabilitation team with no significant increase in rehabilitation services

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1039

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 229

Metadata

Authors
Rudd, A. G., Wolfe, C. D. A., Tilling, K., & Beech, R.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1997-10-25
Volume
315
Issue
7115
Pages
1039-1044
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2076584286
Cited by
229
References
0
FWCI
15.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial to evaluate early discharge scheme for patients with stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1039
The paper
Rudd, A. G., Wolfe, C. D. A., Tilling, K., & Beech, R. (1997). Randomised controlled trial to evaluate early discharge scheme for patients with stroke. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7115.1039

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.