The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England
Open accessAbstract
Three groups (N = 8) of rats received five 10-trial sessions of one-way avoidance training in which each trial was initiated by a 10-sec tone stimulus and terminated either by a shuttle response during the tone (avoidance) or by a response during the electric shock (escape). Rats in groups treated with pimozide (0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg i.p.) failed to acquire to avoidance response although they escaped readily when shock was presented, whereas control rats consistently avoided the shock. The same rats then received several sessions of food-reinforced lever-pressing in a different apparatus; no drugs were given during these sessions. When responding had stabilized, the tone that had signalled shock in the avoidance sessions was presented for a 1-min period. A significant decrease in responding during the tone was observed in all groups when compared to unshocked controls, demonstrating that the pimozide-treated rats, although failing to acquire the avoidance response in the shuttle box, had learned the association between the tone and shock. The results suggested that the neuroleptic-treated animals failed to avoid because of a deficit in the ability to initiate responses rather than a deficit in associative learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ferlie, E. B., & Shortell, S. M. (2001) · The Milbank Quarterly · doi:10.1111/1468-0009.00206 · Cited by 1,335
Lilford, R., Mohammed, M. A., Spiegelhalter, D., & Thomson, R. (2004) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(04)15901-1 · Cited by 448
Reviewing audit: barriers and facilitating factors for effective clinical audit
Johnston, G., Crombie, I. K., Alder, E. M., Davies, H. T. O., & Millard, A. (2000) · Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1136/qhc.9.1.23 · Cited by 317
Pseudoinnovation: the development and spread of healthcare quality improvement methodologies
Walshe, K. (2009) · International Journal for Quality in Health Care · doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzp012 · Cited by 208
What are the most effective strategies for improving quality and safety of health care?
Scott, I. (2009) · Internal Medicine Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1445-5994.2008.01798.x · Cited by 153
Metadata
- Authors
- Scally, G., & Donaldson, L. J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-07-04
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7150
- Pages
- 61-65
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1491918064
- Cited by
- 1,064
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 143.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7150.61
- The paper
- Scally, G., & Donaldson, L. J. (1998). Clinical governance and the drive for quality improvement in the new NHS in England. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7150.61
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.