The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost
Open accessAbstract
Objective: To compare tension-free open mesh hernioplasty under local anaesthetic with transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair under general anaesthetic. Design: A randomised controlled trial of 403 patients with inguinal hernias. Setting: Two acute general hospitals in London between May 1995 and December 1996. Subjects: 400 patients with a diagnosis of groin hernia, 200 in each group. Main outcome measures: Time until discharge, postoperative pain, and complications; patients' perceived health (SF-36), duration of convalescence, and patients' satisfaction with surgery; and health service costs. Results: More patients in the open group (96%) than in the laparoscopic group (89%) were discharged on the same day as the operation (χ 2 =6.7; 1 df; P=0.01). Although pain scores were lower in the open group while the effect of the local anaesthetic persisted (proportional odds ratio at 2 hours 3.5 (2.3 to 5.1)), scores after open repair were significantly higher for each day of the first week (0.5 (0.3 to 0.7) on day 7) and during the second week (0.7 (0.5 to 0.9)). At 1 month there was a greater improvement (or less deterioration) in mean SF-36 scores over baseline in the laparoscopic group compared with the open group on seven of eight dimensions, reaching significance on five. For every activity considered the median time until return to normal was significantly shorter for the laparoscopic group. Patients randomised to laparoscopic repair were more satisfied with surgery at 1 month and 3 months after surgery. The mean cost per patient of laparoscopic repair was £335 (95% confidence interval £228 to £441) more than the cost of open repair. Conclusion: This study confirms that laparoscopic hernia repair has considerable short term clinical advantages after discharge compared with open mesh hernioplasty, although it was more expensive. Key messages: In the 4 hours after surgery laparoscopic hernia repair with general anaesthesia causes more pain than open repair with local anaesthesia (mainly because of the anaesthesia used) and necessitates longer stay in hospital. Laparoscopic hernia repair, however, causes less pain than open hernia repair during the first 2 weeks after discharge Laparoscopic hernia repair results in fewer episodes of wound infection, persistent local pain, genital swelling, numbness, and constipation than open repair. Urinary disturbances are more common after laparoscopic than after open repair Patients' perception of health 1 month after the operation (assessed with the SF-36) and satisfaction with treatment is superior for laparoscopic patients who also have a shorter period of convalescence after surgery The health service cost of day case laparoscopic repair is £335 more than the cost of open mesh hernioplasty performed on a day case basis
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Methods for the Economic Evaluation of Health Care Programmes
Drummond, M. E., Sculpher, M. J., Torrance, G. W., O’Brien, B. J., & Stoddart, G. L. (2005) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198529446.001.0001 · Cited by 13,648
Self-citation
Cited by
International guidelines for groin hernia management
The HerniaSurge Group (2018) · Hernia · doi:10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x · Cited by 2,296
European Hernia Society guidelines on the treatment of inguinal hernia in adult patients
Simons, M. P., Aufenacker, T., Bay-Nielsen, M., Bouillot, J. L., Campanelli, G., Conze, J., de Lange, D., Fortelny, R., Heikkinen, T., Kingsnorth, A., et al. (2009) · Hernia · doi:10.1007/s10029-009-0529-7 · Cited by 1,617
Hernias: inguinal and incisional
Kingsnorth, A., & LeBlanc, K. (2003) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)14746-0 · Cited by 1,083
Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair
McCormack, K., Scott, N., Go, P. M. N. Y. H., Ross, S. J., Grant, A., & Collaboration the EU Hernia Trialists (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001785 · Cited by 809
A Review of Chronic Pain After Inguinal Herniorrhaphy
Poobalan, A. S., Bruce, J., Smith, W. C. S., King, P. M., Krukowski, Z. H., & Chambers, W. A. (2003) · The Clinical Journal of Pain · doi:10.1097/00002508-200301000-00006 · Cited by 579
Metadata
- Authors
- Wellwood, J., Sculpher, M. J., Stoker, D., Nicholls, G. J., Geddes, C., Whitehead, A., Singh, R., & Spiegelhalter, D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1998-07-11
- Volume
- 317
- Issue
- 7151
- Pages
- 103-110
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2033881039
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103
- The paper
- Wellwood, J., Sculpher, M. J., Stoker, D., Nicholls, G. J., Geddes, C., Whitehead, A., Singh, R., & Spiegelhalter, D. (1998). Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus open mesh repair for inguinal hernia: outcome and cost. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7151.103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.