Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 182

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request?Yes, as long as the woman is fully informedMaternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery

Open access
Paterson-Brown, Sara, Amu, Olubusola, Rajendran, Sasha, Bolaji, Ibrahim I·1998·BMJ

Abstract

# Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request? {#article-title-2} Rates of caesarean section are rising, and mothers' requests for elective caesarean section in an uncomplicated pregnancy are not uncommon. Performing a caesarean section when it is not clinically indicated has traditionally been considered inappropriate, but views may be changing. Sara Paterson-Brown and Olubusola Amu and colleagues debate the issue # Yes, as long as the woman is fully informed {#article-title-3} Surgery is performed by doctors when they believe it is clinically justified and in accordance with accepted medical practice. In obstetrics an elective caesarean section in an uncomplicated pregnancy has traditionally been considered inappropriate, and any request for such a procedure has been refused.1 However, the view that this procedure is clinically unjustifiable has been challenged,2 and over the past decade or so prophylactic caesarean section has been gaining credence. 3 4 The balance of benefit versus harm between caesarean section and vaginal delivery is crucial to this debate; although the evidence is incomplete, it challenges the dogma that vaginal delivery is almost always better. The strongest argument against caesarean section relates to maternal complications. However, evidence supporting this for elective operations under regional blockade with antibiotic cover and thromboprophylaxis is poor. Data on mortality from caesarean section relate to procedures performed for medical or obstetric reasons, often emergencies and often under general anaesthesia. 5 6 These are not comparable to the elective procedure, which most practising obstetricians consider safe. Recent evidence of maternal morbidity after caesarean section and normal and instrumental vaginal delivery challenges some deep rooted obstetric and midwifery teachings: normal vaginal deliveries can cause damage to the pelvic floor,7 and instrumental vaginal deliveries are associated with slower recovery8 and greater pelvic floor damage and incontinence9 than normal delivery and caesarean section. Previous caesarean section does compromise future obstetric performance, 10 11 but evidence is limited and, with reduced family size, this has … Correspondence to: Dr Bolaji

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.317.7156.462

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 182

Metadata

Authors
Paterson-Brown, S., Amu, O., Rajendran, S., & Bolaji, I. I.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1998-08-15
Volume
317
Issue
7156
Pages
462-465
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2100512875
Cited by
182
References
2
FWCI
15.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request?Yes, as long as the woman is fully informedMaternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.317.7156.462
The paper
Paterson-Brown, S., Amu, O., Rajendran, S., & Bolaji, I. I. (1998). Should doctors perform an elective caesarean section on request?Yes, as long as the woman is fully informedMaternal choice alone should not determine method of delivery. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.317.7156.462

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.