The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London
Open accessAbstract
Objective : To improve understanding of how first time mothers who belong to a socioeconomic group with particularly low rates of breast feeding decide whether or not to initiate breast feeding. Design : Qualitative semistructured interviews early in pregnancy and 6-10weeks after birth. Setting : Women's homes in east end of London. Subjects : 21 white, low income women expecting their first baby were interviewed mostly at home, often with their partner or a relative. Two focus groups were conducted. Results : Women who had regularly seen a relative or friend successfully breast feed and described this experience positively were more confident about and committed to breast feeding. They were also more likely to succeed. Exposure to breast feeding, however, could be either a positive or a negative influence on the decision to breast feed, depending on the context. Women who had seen breast feeding only by a stranger often described this as a negative influence, particularly if other people were present. All women knew that breast feeding has health benefits. Ownership of this knowledge, however, varied according to the woman's experience of seeing breast feeding. Conclusions : The decision to initiate breast feeding is influenced more by embodied knowledge gained from seeing breast feeding than by theoretical knowledge about its benefits. Breast feeding involves performing a practical skill, often with others present. The knowledge, confidence, and commitment necessary to breast feed may be more effectively gained through antenatal apprenticeship to a breastfeeding mother than from advice given in consultations or from books.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research
Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2010) · Analyzing qualitative data · doi:10.4324/9780203413081_chapter_9 · Cited by 4,800
Cited by
Lahat, E. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7253.83 · Cited by 294
First-time mothers: Social support and confidence in infant care
Leahy Warren, P. (2005) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03425.x · Cited by 272
Breastfeeding as a public health responsibility: A review of the evidence
Brown, A. (2017) · Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1111/jhn.12496 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoddinott, P., & Pill, R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-01-02
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7175
- Pages
- 30-34
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2126210320
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.30
- The paper
- Hoddinott, P., & Pill, R. (1999). Qualitative study of decisions about infant feeding among women in east end of London. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7175.30
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.