The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers
Open accessAbstract
# Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up {#article-title-2} Objective : To evaluate the efficacy of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year. Design : Placebo controlled, double blind trial. Setting : Reykjavik health centre. Subjects : 237 smokers aged 22-66 years living in or around Reykjavik. Interventions : Nicotine patch for 5 months with nicotine nasal spray for 1 year (n=118) or nicotine patch with placebo spray (n=119). Treatment with patches included 15 mg of nicotine for 3 months, 10 mg for the fourth month, and 5 mg for the fifth month, whereas nicotine in the nasal spray was available for up to 1 year. Both groups received supportive treatment. Main outcome measure : Sustained abstinence from smoking. Results : The log rank test for 6 years (χ2=8.5, P=0.004) shows a significant association between abstinence from smoking and type of treatment. Sustained abstinence rates for the patch and nasal spray group and patch only group were 51% v 35% after 6 weeks (P=0.011 (χ 2), 95% confidence interval 1.17% to 3.32%), 37% v 25% after 3 months (P=0.045, 1.01% to 3.08%), 31% v 16% after 6 months (P=0.005, 1.27% to 4.50%), 27% v 11% after 12 months (P=0.001, 1.50% to 6.14%), and 16% v 9% after 6 years (P=0.077, 0.93% to 4.72%). Conclusions : Short and long term abstinence rates show that the combination of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year is a more effective method of stopping smoking than using a patch only. The low percentage of participants using the nasal spray at 1 year, and the few relapses during the second year, suggest that it is not cost effective to use a nasal spray for longer than 7 months after stopping a patch. # Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers {#article-title-20}
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Silagy, C., Lancaster, T., Stead, L., Mant, D., & Fowler, G. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub2 · Cited by 972
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation
Stead, L. F., Perera, R., Bullen, C., Mant, D., & Lancaster, T. (2008) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000146.pub3 · Cited by 721
Effectiveness of smoking cessation therapies: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wu, P., Wilson, K., Dimoulas, P., & Mills, E. J. (2006) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-6-300 · Cited by 484
Piasecki, T. M. (2006) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.11.007 · Cited by 370
Us Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline: Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence
Fiore, M. C., & Staff, G. P. A. (2000) · Respiratory Care · doi:10.1177/002013240004501007 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Blondal, T., Gudmundsson, L. J., Olafsdottir, I., Gustavsson, G., Westin, A., & Stapleton, J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-01-30
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7179
- Pages
- 285-289
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2096115799
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7179.285
- The paper
- Blondal, T., Gudmundsson, L. J., Olafsdottir, I., Gustavsson, G., Westin, A., & Stapleton, J. (1999). Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7179.285
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.