Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 219

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers

Open access
Blondal, T., Gudmundsson, L. J., Olafsdottir, I., Gustavsson, G., Westin, A., Stapleton, J.·1999·BMJ

Abstract

# Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up {#article-title-2} Objective : To evaluate the efficacy of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year. Design : Placebo controlled, double blind trial. Setting : Reykjavik health centre. Subjects : 237 smokers aged 22-66 years living in or around Reykjavik. Interventions : Nicotine patch for 5 months with nicotine nasal spray for 1 year (n=118) or nicotine patch with placebo spray (n=119). Treatment with patches included 15 mg of nicotine for 3 months, 10 mg for the fourth month, and 5 mg for the fifth month, whereas nicotine in the nasal spray was available for up to 1 year. Both groups received supportive treatment. Main outcome measure : Sustained abstinence from smoking. Results : The log rank test for 6 years (χ2=8.5, P=0.004) shows a significant association between abstinence from smoking and type of treatment. Sustained abstinence rates for the patch and nasal spray group and patch only group were 51% v 35% after 6 weeks (P=0.011 (χ 2), 95% confidence interval 1.17% to 3.32%), 37% v 25% after 3 months (P=0.045, 1.01% to 3.08%), 31% v 16% after 6 months (P=0.005, 1.27% to 4.50%), 27% v 11% after 12 months (P=0.001, 1.50% to 6.14%), and 16% v 9% after 6 years (P=0.077, 0.93% to 4.72%). Conclusions : Short and long term abstinence rates show that the combination of using a nicotine patch for 5 months with a nicotine nasal spray for 1 year is a more effective method of stopping smoking than using a patch only. The low percentage of participants using the nasal spray at 1 year, and the few relapses during the second year, suggest that it is not cost effective to use a nasal spray for longer than 7 months after stopping a patch. # Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers {#article-title-20}

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.318.7179.285

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 219

Metadata

Authors
Blondal, T., Gudmundsson, L. J., Olafsdottir, I., Gustavsson, G., Westin, A., & Stapleton, J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
1999-01-30
Volume
318
Issue
7179
Pages
285-289
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2096115799
Cited by
219
References
0
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7179.285
The paper
Blondal, T., Gudmundsson, L. J., Olafsdottir, I., Gustavsson, G., Westin, A., & Stapleton, J. (1999). Nicotine nasal spray with nicotine patch for smoking cessation: randomised trial with six year follow up Commentary: Progress on nicotine replacement therapy for smokers. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7179.285

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.