The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery improves outcome after major elective surgery, and to determine whether the inotropes, adrenaline and dopexamine, used to enhance oxygen delivery influence outcome. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with double blinding between inotrope groups. SETTING: York District Hospital, England. SUBJECTS: 138 patients undergoing major elective surgery who were at risk of developing postoperative complications either because of the surgery or the presence of coexistent medical conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomised into three groups. Two groups received invasive haemodynamic monitoring, fluid, and either adrenaline or dopexamine to increase oxygen delivery. Inotropic support was continued during surgery and for at least 12 hours afterwards. The third group (control) received routine perioperative care. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital mortality and morbidity. RESULTS: Overall, 3/92 (3%) preoptimised patients died compared with 8/46 controls (17%) (P=0.007). There were no differences in mortality between the treatment groups, but 14/46 (30%) patients in the dopexamine group developed complications compared with 24/46 (52%) patients in the adrenaline group (difference 22%, 95% confidence interval 2% to 41%) and 28 patients (61%) in the control group (31%, 11% to 50%). The use of dopexamine was associated with a decreased length of stay in hospital. CONCLUSION: Routine preoperative optimisation of patients undergoing major elective surgery would be a significant and cost effective improvement in perioperative care.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cecconi, M., Corredor, C., Arulkumaran, N., Abuella, G., Ball, J., Grounds, R. M., Hamilton, M., & Rhodes, A. (2012) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc11823 · Cited by 339
Abbas, S. M., & Hill, A. G. (2008) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05233.x · Cited by 296
Goal-directed fluid management reduces vasopressor and catecholamine use in cardiac surgery patients
Goepfert, M. S. G., Reuter, D. A., Akyol, D., Lamm, P., Kilger, E., & Goetz, A. E. (2007) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-006-0404-2 · Cited by 254
Ranucci, M., Isgrò, G., Carlucci, C., De La Torre, T., Enginoli, S., Frigiola, A., & Surgical and Clinical Outcome REsearch (SCORE) Group (2010) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc9217 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilson, J., Woods, I., Fawcett, J., Whall, R., Dibb, W., Morris, C., & McManus, E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 1999-04-24
- Volume
- 318
- Issue
- 7191
- Pages
- 1099-1103
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2169250915
- Cited by
- 769
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.318.7191.1099
- The paper
- Wilson, J., Woods, I., Fawcett, J., Whall, R., Dibb, W., Morris, C., & McManus, E. (1999). Reducing the risk of major elective surgery: randomised controlled trial of preoperative optimisation of oxygen delivery. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7191.1099
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.