The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Randomised controlled trial of nurse practitioner versus general practitioner care for patients requesting "same day" consultations in primary care
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To ascertain any differences between care from nurse practitioners and that from general practitioners for patients seeking "same day" consultations in primary care. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with patients allocated by one of two randomisation schemes (by day or within day). SETTING: 10 general practices in south Wales and south west England. SUBJECTS: 1368 patients requesting same day consultations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient satisfaction, resolution of symptoms and concerns, care provided (prescriptions, investigations, referrals, recall, and length of consultation), information provided to patients, and patients' intentions for seeking care in the future. RESULTS: Generally patients consulting nurse practitioners were significantly more satisfied with their care, although for adults this difference was not observed in all practices. For children, the mean difference between general and nurse practitioner in percentage satisfaction score was -4.8 (95% confidence interval -6.8 to -2.8), and for adults the differences ranged from -8.8 (-13.6 to -3.9) to 3.8 (-3.3 to 10.8) across the practices. Resolution of symptoms and concerns did not differ between the two groups (odds ratio 1.2 (95% confidence interval 0.8 to 1.8) for symptoms and 1.03 (0.8 to 1.4) for concerns). The number of prescriptions issued, investigations ordered, referrals to secondary care, and reattendances were similar between the two groups. However, patients managed by nurse practitioners reported receiving significantly more information about their illnesses and, in all but one practice, their consultations were significantly longer. CONCLUSION: This study supports the wider acceptance of the role of nurse practitioners in providing care to patients requesting same day consultations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Increased involvement of non-physicians such as Registered Nurses (RNs) and Nurse Practitioners (NPs) has long been recognized as an effective way to enhance access to primary care services.6-12”
From Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs. GP-led primary care in British Columbia (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Measurable clinical outcomes are systematically found to be equivalent11,18,19,23,27-32 to those produced by medical models, though patient satisfaction tends to be higher for nurse-provided services.11,19,21,26,27,29,30,33,34”
From Evaluating the cost of NP-led vs. GP-led primary care in British Columbia (2024) · cites this paper as [30]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Patient-Centered Medicine: Transforming the Clinical Method
Stewart, M., Brown, J. B., Weston, W. W., McWhinney, I. R., McWilliam, C. L., & Freeman, T. R. (1995) · Cited by 1,299
Standard occupational classification
Surveys (1990) · HMSO eBooks · Cited by 963
Qureshi, B. (1984) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-06463-8 · Cited by 786
Baker, R. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 360
Communicating with Medical Patients
(1990) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-113-3-259_4 · Cited by 355
The patient-centredness of consultations and outcome in primary care.
Kinnersley, P., Stott, N. C. H., Peters, T. J., & Harvey, I. M. (1999) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 242
Self-citationLong to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice.
Howie, J. G., Porter, A. M., Heaney, D., & Hopton, J. (1991) · PubMed Central · Cited by 206
Parent Satisfaction With Children??s Medical Care
Lewis, C., Scott, D. E., Pantell, R. H., & Wolf, M. H. (1986) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198603000-00003 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Rees M, Kinnersley P. Nurse management of minor illness in general practice. Nursing Times 1996;92:32-3.
- Beckman H, Kaplan SH, Frankel R. Outcome based research on doctor- patient communication: A review. In: Stewart M, Roter D, eds. Communi- cating with medical patients. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1989.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–425 of 425
Nurse Triage Initiative - Improving the Performance of Primary Care Services
Al-Saweer, A., & Al-Sairafi, S. (2006)
Otitis externa - a triage consultation in primary care
Fletcher, J. (2002) · Primary Health Care · doi:10.7748/phc.12.9.21.s19
Hensman-Crook, A. (2014) · Morecambe Bay medical journal · doi:10.48037/mbmj.v7i3.166
Advanced Practice Nursing: A Justified Need
Fagerström, L. (2021) · Advanced practice in nursing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-53555-1_1
Oulton, J. A., & Caldwell, P. (2008) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012373960-5.00531-1
Officer, T. (2018) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17068688
Donald, F., Kilpatrick, K., Reid, K., Carter, N., Martin‐Misener, R., Bryant‐Lukosius, D., Harbman, P., Kaasalainen, S., Marshall, D. A., Charbonneau-Smith, R., et al. (2021) · doi:10.32920/14637009
Officer, T. N., Cumming, J., & McBride‐Henry, K. (2020) · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-28896/v1
Effectiveness of general practice nurse interventions in cardiac risk factor reduction among adults
Halcomb, E., Moujalli, S., Griffiths, R., & Davidson, P. M. (2007) · The JBI Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports · doi:10.11124/01938924-200705070-00001
Problems of the Effectiveness of the Work of General Practitioners
Kengespayev, M., & Tursynbet, Y. (2022) · Journal of Health Development · doi:10.32921/2225-9929-2022-2-46-49-59 · Cited by 2
Desmet, L., Seuntjens, L., & Bogaert, P. V. (2024) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.16075
Wasik, M., Strzelecka, A., & Kozieł, D. (2024) · Pielęgniarstwo Chirurgiczne i Angiologiczne/Surgical and Vascular Nursing · doi:10.5114/pchia.2024.138939
A Citation Analysis of the Top 50 Most Cited Nurse Practitioner Publications
Halfpenny, A., & Huntley, J. S. (2024) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.74406
Late effects and long-term follow-up in survivors of childhood and adolescent cancer
Janssens, F., Meijnders, P., & Verlooy, J. (2025) · Academia oncology. · doi:10.20935/acadonco7950
Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioners' Judgments of Coronary Heart Disease Risk
Stamp, K. D. (2006) · Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)
Additional file 1 of Perceptions of underlying practice hierarchies: Who is managing my care?
Officer, T. N., & McBride‐Henry, K. (2021) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16570010
Lai, M. M. Y., Roberts, N., Mohebbi, M., & Martin, J. A. (2020) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.12838899
Smigorowsky, M. J., & Tsuyuki, R. T. (2026) · CJC Open · doi:10.1016/j.cjco.2026.03.018
Karnapooshanam, K., George, L., Murali, J., & Baalann, K. P. (2026) · International Journal of Health Sciences and Research · doi:10.52403/ijhsr.20260723
Effects of perceived racism, cultural mistrust and trust in providers on satisfaction with care.
(2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 278
(2006) · PubMed Central · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Kinnersley, P.
- Affiliations
- Cardiff University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kinnersley, P.
- ORCID
- Kinnersley, P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-04-15
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7241
- Pages
- 1043-1048
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC27347
- OpenAlex
- W2064193170
- Cited by
- 428
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 62.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ORCA Online Research @Cardiff (Cardiff University) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Office of Research and Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Keywords
- nurse practitioners, general practitioners, primary care, patient satisfaction, symptom resolution, consultation time, patient information, children, adults, nurse practitioner role
- MeSH terms
- Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, England, Family Practice, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Male, Middle Aged, Nurse Practitioners, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Time Factors, Wales, Patient Satisfaction, Patient Selection
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
