The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Health impact assessment
Open accessAbstract
It is widely accepted that the health of a population is determined by a range of factors and that the greatest scope for improving the public's health lies outside the control of the NHS. Health impact assessment (HIA) has emerged to identify those activities and policies likely to have major impacts on the health of a population. #### Summary points Health impact assessment is a structured method for assessing and improving the health consequences of projects and policies in the non-health sector It is a multidisciplinary process combining a range of qualitative and quantitative evidence in a decision making framework Applications include national policy appraisal, local urban planning, transport, and water and agricultural projects Benefits include improved interagency collaboration and public participation Limitations include a lack of agreed methods and gaps in the evidence base for health impacts Health impact assessment is a means of evidence based policy making for improvement in health. It is a combination of methods whose aim is to assess the health consequences to a population of a policy, project, or programme that does not necessarily have health as its primary objective.1 Health impact assessment is a multidisciplinary process within which a range of evidence about the health effects of a proposal is considered in a structured framework. It takes into account the opinions and expectations of those who may be affected by a proposed policy. Potential health impacts of a proposal are analysed and used to influence the decision making process. A health impact assessment is based on a broad model of health, which proposes that economic, political, social, psychological, and environmental factors determine population health (box B1). For the first time these wider determinants of health have been acknowledged by the UK government in the white paper Saving Lives : Our Healthier Nation .2 This …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Housing and Health: Time Again for Public Health Action
Krieger, J., & Higgins, D. L. (2002) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.92.5.758 · Cited by 1,550
Advancing social connection as a public health priority in the United States.
Holt-Lunstad, J., Robles, T. F., & Sbarra, D. A. (2017) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000103 · Cited by 978
Conceptualising social impacts
Vanclay, F. (2002) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(01)00105-6 · Cited by 580
The Social Determinants of Mental Health
Compton, M. T., & Shim, R. S. (2015) · Focus · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20150017 · Cited by 564
Natural experiments: an underused tool for public health?
Petticrew, M., Cummins, S., Ferrell, C., Findlay, A., Higgins, C., Hoy, C., Kearns, A., & Sparks, L. (2005) · Public Health · doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2004.11.008 · Cited by 318
Metadata
- Authors
- Lock, K.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2000-05-20
- Volume
- 320
- Issue
- 7246
- Pages
- 1395-1398
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072244711
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 79.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Health impact assessment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1395
- The paper
- Lock, K. (2000). Health impact assessment. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7246.1395
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.