The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Birth weight and cognitive function in the British 1946 birth cohort: longitudinal population based study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between birth weight and cognitive function in the normal population. DESIGN: A longitudinal, population based, birth cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: 3900 males and females born in 1946. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive function from childhood to middle life (measured at ages 8, 11, 15, 26, and 43 years). RESULTS: Birth weight was significantly and positively associated with cognitive ability at age 8 (with an estimated standard deviation score of 0.44 (95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.59)) between the lowest and highest birthweight categories after sex, father's social class, mother's education, and birth order were controlled for. This association was evident across the normal birthweight range (>2.5 kg) and so was not accounted for exclusively by low birth weight. The association was also observed at ages 11, 15, and 26, and weakly at age 43, although these associations were dependent on the association at age 8. Birth weight was also associated with education, with those of higher birth weight more likely to have achieved higher qualifications, and this effect was accounted for partly by cognitive function at age 8. CONCLUSIONS: Birth weight was associated with cognitive ability at age 8 in the general population, and in the normal birthweight range. The effect at this age largely explains associations between birth weight and cognitive function at subsequent ages. Similarly, the association between birth weight and education was accounted for partly by earlier cognitive scores.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Smith, J. A. (1996) · Psychology & Health · doi:10.1080/08870449608400256 · Cited by 2,380
Statistic Notes: Regression towards the mean
Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1994) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.308.6942.1499 · Cited by 547
Cited by
Victora, C. G., Horta, B. L., de Mola, C. L., Quevedo, L., Pinheiro, R. T., Gigante, D. P., Gonçalves, H., & Barros, F. C. (2015) · The Lancet Global Health · doi:10.1016/s2214-109x(15)70002-1 · Cited by 785
Pregnancy-specific stress, prenatal health behaviors, and birth outcomes.
Lobel, M., Cannella, D. L., Graham, J. E., DeVincent, C., Schneider, J., & Meyer, B. A. (2008) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0013242 · Cited by 587
Lifecourse Social Conditions and Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cognitive Aging
Glymour, M. M., & Manly, J. J. (2008) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-008-9064-z · Cited by 481
Perinatal outcome and later implications of intrauterine growth restriction
Pallotto, E. K., & Kilbride, H. W. (2006) · Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00003081-200606000-00008 · Cited by 427
Understanding Pensions: Cognitive Function, Numerical Ability and Retirement Saving*
Banks, J., & Oldfield, Z. (2007) · Fiscal Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1475-5890.2007.00052.x · Cited by 345
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-01-27
- Volume
- 322
- Issue
- 7280
- Pages
- 199-203
- ISSN
- 0959-8138 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074661773
- Cited by
- 409
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Birth weight and cognitive function in the British 1946 birth cohort: longitudinal population based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.322.7280.199
- The paper
- Richards, M. (2001). Birth weight and cognitive function in the British 1946 birth cohort: longitudinal population based study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7280.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.