The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Coping with complexity: educating for capability
Open accessAbstract
This is the last in a series of four articles Recent high profile scandals in the United Kingdom have highlighted the changing values by which the National Health Service is judged.1 The public expects, and the government has promised to deliver, a health service that is ever safer, constantly up to date, and focused on patients' changing needs. Successful health services in the 21st century must aim not merely for change, improvement, and response, but for changeability, improvability, and responsiveness. Educators are therefore challenged to enable not just competence, but also capability (box). Capability ensures that the delivery of health care keeps up with its ever changing context. Education providers must offer an environment and process that enables individuals to develop sustainable abilities appropriate for a continuously evolving organisation. Recent announcements in the United Kingdom of a “university for the NHS,”2 a “national leadership programme,”3 and “workforce confederations”4 raise the question of what kind of education and training will help the NHS to deliver its goals #### Capability is more than competence Competence —what individuals know or are able to do in terms of knowledge, skills, attitude Capability —extent to which individuals can adapt to change, generate new knowledge, and continue to improve their performance #### Summary points Traditional education and training largely focuses on enhancing competence (knowledge, skills, and attitudes) In today's complex world, we must educate not merely for competence, but for capability (the ability to adapt to change, generate new knowledge, and continuously improve performance) Capability is enhanced through feedback on performance, the challenge of unfamiliar contexts, and the use of non-linear methods such as story telling and small group, problem based learning Education for capability must focus on process (supporting learners to construct their own learning goals, receive feedback, reflect, and consolidate) and avoid goals with rigid and prescriptive content The …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The challenge of complexity in health care
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · Cited by 2,578
Self-citation
Cited by
The challenge of complexity in health care
Plsek, P. E., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7313.625 · Cited by 2,578
Self-citationProctor, E. K., Landsverk, J., Aarons, G., Chambers, D., Glisson, C., & Mittman, B. (2009) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4 · Cited by 1,894
Assessment in medical education
Epstein, R. M. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra054784 · Cited by 1,872
Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research
Noble, H., & Smith, J. (2015) · Evidence Based Nursing · doi:10.1136/eb-2015-102054 · Cited by 1,758
The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice, and scientific inquiry
Borrell-Carrio, F. (2004) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.245 · Cited by 1,546
Metadata
- Authors
- Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-10-06
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 7316
- Pages
- 799-803
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2096069917
- Cited by
- 889
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 25.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Coping with complexity: educating for capability. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799
- The paper
- Fraser, S. W., & Greenhalgh, T. (2001). Coping with complexity: educating for capability. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7316.799
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.