The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities
Open accessAbstract
This article was first published in the British Medical Journal Volume 323 Issue 7321. BMJ allows authors to use their own articles for their own non commercial purposes. www.bmj.com Reproduced with permission from Dr. James E. Till
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Kuss, O., & Sa, E.-R. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.20.2691 · Cited by 1,871
Self-citationEysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7449.1166 · Cited by 1,268
Self-citationUsing the Internet for Surveys and Health Research
Eysenbach, G., & Wyatt, J. (2002) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13 · Cited by 790
Self-citationThe impact of the internet on cancer outcomes.
Eysenbach, G. (2003) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/canjclin.53.6.356 · Cited by 573
Self-citationInfodemiology and Infoveillance
Eysenbach, G. (2011) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2011.02.006 · Cited by 414
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2001-11-10
- Volume
- 323
- Issue
- 7321
- Pages
- 1103-1105
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2107045659
- Cited by
- 969
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 50.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
- The paper
- Eysenbach, G., & Till, J. E. (2001). Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1103
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
