The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Objectives: To determine whether earlier clinical intervention by a medical emergency team prompted by clinical instability in a patient could reduce the incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital. Design: A non-randomised, population based study before (1996) and after (1999) introduction of the medical emergency team. Setting: 300 bed tertiary referral teaching hospital. Participants: All patients admitted to the hospital in 1996 (n=19 317) and 1999 (n=22 847). Interventions: Medical emergency team (two doctors and one senior intensive care nurse) attended clinically unstable patients immediately with resuscitation drugs, fluid, and equipment. Response activated by the bedside nurse or doctor according to predefined criteria. Main outcome measures: Incidence and outcome of unexpected cardiac arrest. Results: The incidence of unexpected cardiac arrest was 3.77 per 1000 hospital admissions (73 cases) in 1996 (before intervention) and 2.05 per 1000 admissions (47 cases) in 1999 (after intervention), with mortality being 77% (56 patients) and 55% (26 patients), respectively. After adjustment for case mix the intervention was associated with a 50% reduction in the incidence of unexpected cardiac arrest (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.35 to 0.73). Conclusions: In clinically unstable inpatients early intervention by a medical emergency team significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital. What is already known on this topic In most studies mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital exceeds 50% Such events are usually preceded by signs of clinical deterioration in the hours before cardiac arrest What this paper adds Early intervention by a medical emergency team significantly reduced the incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrest in hospital
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Monsieurs, K. G., Nolan, J. P., Bossaert, L. L., Greif, R., Maconochie, I. K., Nikolaou, N. I., Perkins, G. D., Soar, J., Truhlář, A., Wyllie, J., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038 · Cited by 915
Gao, H., McDonnell, A., Harrison, D. A., Moore, T., Adam, S., Daly, K., Esmonde, L., Goldhill, D. R., Parry, G. J., Rashidian, A., et al. (2007) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-007-0532-3 · Cited by 466
Cardoso, L. T., Grion, C. M., Matsuo, T., Anami, E. H., Kauss, I. A., Seko, L., & Bonametti, A. M. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc9975 · Cited by 461
Rapid-Response Systems as a Patient Safety Strategy: A Systematic Review
Winters, B. D., Weaver, S. J., Pfoh, E. R., Yang, T., Pham, J. C., & Dy, S. M. (2013) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-158-5-201303051-00009 · Cited by 438
Ball, C., Kirkby, M., & Williams, S. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7422.1014 · Cited by 270
Metadata
- Authors
- Buist, M. D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-02-16
- Volume
- 324
- Issue
- 7334
- Pages
- 387-390
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2152249452
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 39.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7334.387
- The paper
- Buist, M. D. (2002). Effects of a medical emergency team on reduction of incidence of and mortality from unexpected cardiac arrests in hospital: preliminary study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7334.387
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.