The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Patient non-compliance with paper diaries
Open accessAbstract
Doctors often ask patients to recall recent health experiences, such as pain, fatigue, and quality of life. 1 Research has shown, however, that recall is unreliable and rife with inaccuracies and biases. 2 Recognition of recall's shortcomings has led to the use of diaries, which are intended to capture experiences close to the time of occurrence, thus limiting recall bias and producing more accurate data.3 The rationale for using diaries would be undermined if patients failed to complete diaries according to protocol.In this study we used a newly developed paper diary that could objectively record when patients made diary entries in order to compare patients' reported and actual compliance with diary keeping.For comparison, we also used an electronic diary designed to enhance compliance in order to assess what compliance rates might be achieved.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The electronic data were compared to the self-reported record of self-monitoring and revealed that there was little concordance between the self-reported and electronically documented data (35, 37).”
From Self-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature (2011) · cites this paper as [37]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(2018) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315167534 · Cited by 1,147
Diary keeping in asthma: comparison of written and electronic methods.
Hyland, M. E., Kenyon, C. A. P., Allen, R., & Howarth, P. H. (1993) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.306.6876.487 · Cited by 144
Gustavson, J. G. A. A. R. (1997) · APS observer · Cited by 133
High-quality clinical databases: breaking down barriers
Black, N. A. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)00108-7 · Cited by 125
Progress in Ambulatory Assessment
Fahrenberg, J., & Myrtek, M. (2001) · FreiDok plus (Universitätsbibliothek Freiburg) · Cited by 101
Ecological Momentary Assessment: Real-world, real-time measurement of patient experience.
Hufford, M. R., Shiffman, S. M., Paty, J. A., & Stone, A. A. (2001) · Cited by 53
Self-citationHealth Information Systems: Design Issues and Analytic Applications
McGlynn, E. A., Damberg, C. L., Kerr, E. A., & Brook, R. H. (1998) · RAND Corporation eBooks · doi:10.7249/mr967 · Cited by 34
Clinical Data Bases???Accomplishments and Unrealized Potential
&NA; (1985) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198505000-00024 · Cited by 13
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Shiffman, 2001, Subject experience diaries in clinical research. Part 1. The patient experience movement, Appl Clin Trials, 10, 46
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecological momentary assessment
Shiffman, S., Stone, A. A., & Hufford, M. R. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091415 · Cited by 6,454
Self-citationSelf-monitoring in weight loss: a systematic review of the literature
Burke, L. E., Wang, J., & Sevick, M. A. (2011) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/j.jada.2010.10.008 · Cited by 1,203
“The electronic data were compared to the self-reported record of self-monitoring and revealed that there was little concordance between the selfreported and electronically documented data (35,37).”
Patrick, D. L., Burke, L. B., Gwaltney, C. J., Leidy, N. K., Martin, M. L., Molsen, E., & Ring, L. (2011) · Value in Health · doi:10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.013 · Cited by 1,135
Diary Studies in Organizational Research
Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010) · Journal of Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1027/1866-5888/a000009 · Cited by 1,234
Patient compliance with paper and electronic diaries
Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R. (2003) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00320-3 · Cited by 910
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Stone, A. A., Shiffman, S., Schwartz, J. E., Broderick, J. E., & Hufford, M. R.
- Affiliations
- Stony Brook University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stone, Arthur A
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2002-05-18
- Volume
- 324
- Issue
- 7347
- Pages
- 1193-1194
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC111114
- OpenAlex
- W2135374245
- Semantic Scholar
- fa7362653cde1df677f2bce06810aebf6ca6b177
- Cited by
- 810
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 34 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 44 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 38
- FWCI
- 135.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA085819, CA-85819)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- medication adherence, paper diaries, electronic diary, recall bias, patient-reported outcomes, self-monitoring
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Humans, Medical Records, Intractable Pain, Treatment Refusal
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
