Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 238

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis

Open access
Schumacher Jr, H Ralph, Boice, Judith A, Daikh, David I, Mukhopadhyay, Saurabh, Malmstrom, Kerstin, Ng, Jennifer, Tate, Guillermo A, Molina, Javier·2002·BMJ

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of etoricoxib, a selective cyclo-oxygenase-2 inhibitor, in comparison with indometacin in the treatment of acute gouty arthritis. Design: Randomised, double blind, active comparator controlled trial. Setting: 43 outpatient study centres in 11 countries. Participants: 142 men and eight women (75 patients per treatment group) aged 18 years or over presenting with clinically diagnosed acute gout within 48 hours of onset. Interventions: Etoricoxib 120 mg administered orally once daily versus indometacin 50 mg administered orally three times daily, both for 8 days Main outcome measures: Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint over days 2 to 5 (primary end point); investigators' and patients' global assessments of response to treatment and tenderness of the study joint (key secondary end points). Results: Etoricoxib showed efficacy comparable to indometacin. Patients' assessment of pain in the study joint (0-4 point Likert scale, “no pain” to “extreme pain”) over days 2 to 5 showed a least squares mean change from baseline of −1.72 (95% confidence interval −1.90 to −1.55) for etoricoxib and −1.83 (−2.01 to −1.65) for indometacin. The difference between treatment groups met prespecified comparability criteria. All other efficacy end points, including those reflecting reduction in inflammation and analgesia, provided corroborative evidence of comparable efficacy. Significant pain relief was evident at the first measurement, 4 hours after the first dose of treatment. Prespecified safety analyses revealed that drug related adverse experiences occurred significantly less frequently with etoricoxib (22.7%) than with indometacin (46.7%) (P=0.003), although overall adverse experience rates were similar between the two treatment groups. Conclusion: Etoricoxib 120 mg once daily provides rapid and effective treatment for acute gouty arthritis comparable to indometacin 50 mg three times daily. Etoricoxib was generally safe and well tolerated in this study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1488

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 238

Metadata

Authors
Schumacher Jr, H. R., Boice, J. A., Daikh, D. I., Mukhopadhyay, S., Malmstrom, K., Ng, J., Tate, G. A., & Molina, J.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2002-06-22
Volume
324
Issue
7352
Pages
1488-1492
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2137981468
Cited by
238
References
0
FWCI
9.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1488
The paper
Schumacher Jr, H. R., Boice, J. A., Daikh, D. I., Mukhopadhyay, S., Malmstrom, K., Ng, J., Tate, G. A., & Molina, J. (2002). Randomised double blind trial of etoricoxib and indometacin in treatment of acute gouty arthritis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.324.7352.1488

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.