Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study

Open access
Henkel, Verena, Mergl, Roland, Kohnen, Ralf, Maier, Wolfgang, Möller, Hans-Jürgen, Hegerl, Ulrich·2003·BMJ

Abstract

Background Guselkumab is the first human monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to the p19 subunit of IL23. It’s approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Objectives We present a case series of patients with psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis who had a good response to Guselkumab and theirs cardiovascular risk factors. Methods An observational and retrospective study of patients with psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis under treatment with Guselkumab in the Dermatology and Rheumatology consultation at our hospital. A total of 11 patients were included. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk were collected. The SCORE (European High Risk Chart) and cardiovascular risk categories (European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society 2019) were used. Disease severity and treatment response were assessed by PASI, DLQI, DAPSA and ASDAS at baseline and after 12, 24 and 36 weeks. Results Our cases had a mean age of 52.45 years, 63.6% of them were women. A total of 45.5% had polyarticular psoriatic arthritis. 90.9% were obese, 45.45% were type 2 obesity, with a mean BMI of 34.88. Dyslipidemia and hypertension were observed in 54.5% and 72.7% of the patients, respectively. They all had varying degrees of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A total of 45.5% had SCORE >1% and 90.9% were in moderate category of cardiovascular risk. At baseline their disease parameters were: PASI=11.09 (± 7.01), DLQI=15.09 (± 7.33), DAPSA=19.11 (± 9.95) and ASDAS=2.12 (± 0.43). After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean reduction of PASI and DLQI was 7.09 and 6.45, which continued improving at week 36. None of them were naive. There were no adverse effects, with a treatment survival of 76.73 weeks (± 42.93). Conclusion Guselkumab showed excellent results in our clinical practice in the control of psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis in non-naive patients with cardiovascular risk factors, with a good safety profile. References [1]Hawkes JE, Yan BY, Chan TC, Krueger JG. Discovery of the IL-23/IL-17 Signaling Pathway and the Treatment of Psoriasis. J Immunol. 2018;201(6):1605-1613. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800013 [2]Nawas Z, Hatch M, Ramos E, et al. A Review of Guselkumab, an IL-23 Inhibitor, for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2017;22(2):8-10 [3]Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Tam LS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(5):2109-2121. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keab119. [4]Sans S, Fitzgerald AP, Royo D, Conroy R, Graham I. Calibración de la tabla SCORE de riesgo cardiovascular para España [Calibrating the SCORE cardiovascular risk chart for use in Spain]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60(5):476-485. [5]Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk [published correction appears in Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21;41(44):4255]. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 Disclosure of Interests None declared

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.200

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Maier, W., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2003-01-25
Volume
326
Issue
7382
Pages
200.1-201
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2118121474
Cited by
309
References
18
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence
www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.200
The paper
Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Maier, W., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U. (2003). Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.