The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Background Guselkumab is the first human monoclonal antibody that binds selectively to the p19 subunit of IL23. It’s approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Objectives We present a case series of patients with psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis who had a good response to Guselkumab and theirs cardiovascular risk factors. Methods An observational and retrospective study of patients with psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis under treatment with Guselkumab in the Dermatology and Rheumatology consultation at our hospital. A total of 11 patients were included. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and cardiovascular risk were collected. The SCORE (European High Risk Chart) and cardiovascular risk categories (European Society of Cardiology, European Atherosclerosis Society 2019) were used. Disease severity and treatment response were assessed by PASI, DLQI, DAPSA and ASDAS at baseline and after 12, 24 and 36 weeks. Results Our cases had a mean age of 52.45 years, 63.6% of them were women. A total of 45.5% had polyarticular psoriatic arthritis. 90.9% were obese, 45.45% were type 2 obesity, with a mean BMI of 34.88. Dyslipidemia and hypertension were observed in 54.5% and 72.7% of the patients, respectively. They all had varying degrees of Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). A total of 45.5% had SCORE >1% and 90.9% were in moderate category of cardiovascular risk. At baseline their disease parameters were: PASI=11.09 (± 7.01), DLQI=15.09 (± 7.33), DAPSA=19.11 (± 9.95) and ASDAS=2.12 (± 0.43). After 12 weeks of treatment, the mean reduction of PASI and DLQI was 7.09 and 6.45, which continued improving at week 36. None of them were naive. There were no adverse effects, with a treatment survival of 76.73 weeks (± 42.93). Conclusion Guselkumab showed excellent results in our clinical practice in the control of psoriasis and / or psoriatic arthritis in non-naive patients with cardiovascular risk factors, with a good safety profile. References [1]Hawkes JE, Yan BY, Chan TC, Krueger JG. Discovery of the IL-23/IL-17 Signaling Pathway and the Treatment of Psoriasis. J Immunol. 2018;201(6):1605-1613. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1800013 [2]Nawas Z, Hatch M, Ramos E, et al. A Review of Guselkumab, an IL-23 Inhibitor, for Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis. Skin Therapy Lett. 2017;22(2):8-10 [3]Mease PJ, McInnes IB, Tam LS, et al. Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021;60(5):2109-2121. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keab119. [4]Sans S, Fitzgerald AP, Royo D, Conroy R, Graham I. Calibración de la tabla SCORE de riesgo cardiovascular para España [Calibrating the SCORE cardiovascular risk chart for use in Spain]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2007;60(5):476-485. [5]Mach F, Baigent C, Catapano AL, et al. 2019 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the management of dyslipidaemias: lipid modification to reduce cardiovascular risk [published correction appears in Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21;41(44):4255]. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(1):111-188. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz455 Disclosure of Interests None declared
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Qualitative evaluation and research methods
Ellis, D. (1990) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/0268-4012(90)90041-p · Cited by 17,943
Spitzer, R. L. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.18.1737 · Cited by 9,802
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Brodsky, C. M. (1968) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(68)71872-7 · Cited by 6,679
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Wakeford, J. (1969) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/003803856900300233 · Cited by 1,460
The psychometric properties of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview
Andrews, G., & Peters, L. (1998) · Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s001270050026 · Cited by 876
National service framework for coronary heart disease
Lloyd-Mostyn, R. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7261.634 · Cited by 832
Validity of clinical diagnosis of heart failure in primary health care
REMES, J., MlETTINEN, H., REUNANEN, A., & PYÖRÄLÄ, K. (1991) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a059896 · Cited by 538
Why general practitioners do not implement evidence: qualitative study
Freeman, A. C., & Sweeney, K. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7321.1100 · Cited by 400
Techniques of Validation in Qualitative Research: a Critical Commentary
Bloor, M. (1997) · Context and Method in Qualitative Research · doi:10.4135/9781849208758.n3 · Cited by 316
Echocardiography in chronic heart failure in the community
WHEELDON, N. M., MacDonald, T. M., FLUCKER, C. J., McKendrick, A. D., McDevitt, D. G., & Struthers, A. D. (1993) · QJM · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.qjmed.a068731 · Cited by 265
Cited by
The WHO-5 well-being index: A systematic review of the literature
Topp, C. W., Østergaard, S. D., Søndergaard, S., & Bech, P. (2015) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000376585 · Cited by 4,708
Combat Duty in Iraq and Afghanistan, Mental Health Problems, and Barriers to Care
Hoge, C. W., Castro, C. A., Messer, S. C., McGurk, D., Cotting, D. I., & Koffman, R. L. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa040603 · Cited by 4,778
An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ–4
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2009) · Psychosomatics · doi:10.1016/s0033-3182(09)70864-3 · Cited by 4,261
Validity of the brief patient health questionnaire mood scale (PHQ-9) in the general population
Martin, A., Rief, W., Klaiberg, A., & Braehler, E. (2006) · General Hospital Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2005.07.003 · Cited by 1,379
Clinical diagnosis of depression in primary care: a meta-analysis
Mitchell, A. J., Vaze, A., & Rao, S. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(09)60879-5 · Cited by 1,251
Metadata
- Authors
- Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Maier, W., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-01-25
- Volume
- 326
- Issue
- 7382
- Pages
- 200.1-201
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2118121474
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 6.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.200
- The paper
- Henkel, V., Mergl, R., Kohnen, R., Maier, W., Möller, H.-J., & Hegerl, U. (2003). Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.326.7382.200
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.