The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors
Open accessAbstract
The importance of patient preferences in treatment decisions-challenges for doctors
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“While the importance of patient preferences in medical treatment decision-making is increasingly recognized,11,12”
From Conventional and unconventional treatments for stress among methadone-maintained patients: Treatment willingness and perceived efficacy (2010) · cites this paper as [12]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Charles, C. A., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. J. (1999) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00145-8 · Cited by 2,336
Expanding Patient Involvement in Care
Greenfield, S., Kaplan, S. H., & Ware, J. E. (1985) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-102-4-520 · Cited by 1,459
Do Patients Want to Participate in Medical Decision Making?
Strull, W. M. (1984) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03350210038026 · Cited by 773
Towle, A., Godolphin, W., Greenhalgh, T., & Gambrill, J. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.766 · Cited by 646
Explaining risks: turning numerical data into meaningful pictures
Edwards, A., Elwyn, G. J., & Mulley, A. G. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7341.827 · Cited by 645
Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?
Coulter, A., Entwistle, V. A., & Gilbert, D. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7179.318 · Cited by 638
Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation.
Elwyn, G. J., Edwards, A., & Kinnersley, P. (1999) · PubMed Central · Cited by 499
Elwyn, G. J., Edwards, A., Gwyn, R., & Grol, R. P. T. M. (1999) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753 · Cited by 299
Perils, Pitfalls, and Possibilities in Talking About Medical Risk
Bogardus, S. T. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.11.1037 · Cited by 219
Qualitative study of evidence based leaflets in maternity care
Stapleton, H. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7338.639 · Cited by 208
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. J. (2017) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2031-8 · Cited by 3,938
Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review
Bombard, Y., Baker, G. R., Orlando, E., Fancott, C. A., Bhatia, P., Casalino, S., Oñate, K., Denis, J., & Pomey, M. (2018) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z · Cited by 1,312
Joosten, E. A. G., DeFuentes-Merillas, L., de Weert, G. H., Sensky, T., van der Staak, C. P. F., & de Jong, C. A. J. (2008) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000126073 · Cited by 1,135
Sekhon, M., Cartwright, M., & Francis, J. (2022) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-022-07577-3 · Cited by 627
de Graeff, A., & Dean, M. (2007) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1089/jpm.2006.0139 · Cited by 460
Metadata
- Authors
- Say, R. E., & Thomson, R.
- Affiliations
- Newcastle University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thomson, Richard
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-09-04
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 7414
- Pages
- 542-545
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- PMC
- PMC192849
- OpenAlex
- W2059511970
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 23
- FWCI
- 42.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- patient preferences, treatment decision-making, shared decision-making, physician-patient relationship, clinical decision-making
- MeSH terms
- Family Practice, Humans, Patient Education as Topic, Patient Participation, Physician-Patient Relations, Negotiating, Patient Satisfaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review