The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: database study
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To investigate time trends in mortality after admission to hospital for fractured neck of femur from 1968 to 1998, and to report on the effects of demographic factors on mortality. Design Analysis of hospital inpatient statistics for fractured neck of femur, incorporating linkage to death certificates. Setting Four counties in southern England. Subjects 32 590 people aged 65 years or over admitted to hospital with fractured neck of femur between 1968 and 1998. Main outcome measures Case fatality rates at 30, 90, and 365 days after admission, and standardised mortality ratios at monthly intervals up to one year after admission. Results Case fatality rates declined between the 1960s and the early 1980s, but there was no appreciable fall thereafter. They increased sharply with increasing age: for example, fatality rates at 30 days in 1984–98 increased from 4% in men aged 64–69 years to 31% in those aged ≥ 90. They were higher in men than women, and in social classes IV and V than in classes I and II. In the first month after fracture, standardised mortality ratios in women were 16 times higher, and those in men 12 times higher, than mortality in the same age group in the general population. Conclusions The high mortality rates, and the fact that they have not fallen over the past 20 years, reinforce the need for measures to prevent osteoporosis and falls and their consequences in elderly people. Whether post-fracture mortality has fallen to an irreducible minimum, or whether further decline is possible, is unclear.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Excess mortality following hip fracture: a systematic epidemiological review
Abrahamsen, B., van Staa, T., Ariely, R., Olson, M., & Cooper, C. (2009) · Osteoporosis International · doi:10.1007/s00198-009-0920-3 · Cited by 1,079
Role of Inactivity in Chronic Diseases: Evolutionary Insight and Pathophysiological Mechanisms
Booth, F. W., Roberts, C. K., Thyfault, J. P., Ruegsegger, G. N., & Toedebusch, R. G. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00019.2016 · Cited by 696
Maxwell, M. J., Moran, C. G., & Moppett, I. K. (2008) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aen236 · Cited by 369
Frailty: different tools for different purposes?
Martin, F. C., & Brighton, P. (2008) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/ageing/afn011 · Cited by 147
Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar
DeLusignan, S., Valentin, T., Chan, T., Hague, N., Wood, O., VanVlymen, J., & Dhoul, N. (2004) · Journal of Innovation in Health Informatics · doi:10.14236/jhi.v12i3.120 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Roberts, S. E., & Goldacre, M. J.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-10-02
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 7418
- Pages
- 771-775
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2150513504
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: database study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.327.7418.771
- The paper
- Roberts, S. E., & Goldacre, M. J. (2003). Time trends and demography of mortality after fractured neck of femur in an English population, 1968–98: database study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7418.771
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.