The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study
Open accessAbstract
Objective To evaluate the effect of comorbidity and other risk factors on postoperative mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing major oesophageal and gastric surgery. Design Multicentre cohort study with data on postoperative mortality and morbidity in hospital. Data source and methods The ASCOT prospective database, comprising 2087 patients with newly diagnosed oesophageal and gastric cancer in 24 hospitals in England and Wales between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 2002. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to model the risk of death and postoperative complications. Results 955 patients underwent oesophagectomy or gastrectomy. Of these, 253 (27%) were graded ASA III or IV, and 187 (20%) had a high physiological POSSUM score (≥ 20). Operative mortality was 12% (111/955). Physiological POSSUM score, surgeon's assessment, type of operation, hospital case volume, and tumour stage independently predicted operative mortality. Medical complications were associated with higher physiological POSSUM scores and ASA grade, oesophagectomy or total gastrectomy, thoracotomy, and radical nodal dissection. Stage and additional organ resection predicted surgical (technical) complications. Conclusions Many patients undergoing surgery for gastro-oesophageal cancer have major comorbid disease, which strongly influences their risk of postoperative death. Technical complications do not seem to be influenced by preoperative factors but reflect the extent of surgery and perhaps surgical judgment. Detailed prospective multicentre cooperative audit, with appropriate risk adjustment, is fundamental in the evaluation of cancer care and must be properly resourced.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
Hughes, M. J., Hackney, R. J., Lamb, P. J., Wigmore, S. J., Christopher Deans, D. A., & Skipworth, R. J. E. (2019) · World Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00268-019-04950-y · Cited by 393
Jhanji, S., Thomas, B., Ely, A., Watson, D., Hinds, C. J., & Pearse, R. M. (2008) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05560.x · Cited by 259
Systematic Review and Validation of Prognostic Models in Liver Transplantation
Jacob, M., Lewsey, J. D., Sharpin, C., Gimson, A., Rela, M., & van der Meulen, J. H. P. (2005) · Liver Transplantation · doi:10.1002/lt.20456 · Cited by 68
Metadata
- Authors
- McCulloch, P., Ward, J., & Tekkis, P. P.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-11-20
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 7425
- Pages
- 1192-1197
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2099972879
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1192
- The paper
- McCulloch, P., Ward, J., & Tekkis, P. P. (2003). Mortality and morbidity in gastro-oesophageal cancer surgery: initial results of ASCOT multicentre prospective cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1192
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.