The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Missing women—revisited
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Telomeres are bound by dedicated protein complexes, like shelterin in mammals, which protect telomeres from DNA damage. In the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, a comprehensive understanding of the proteins interacting with the telomere sequence is lacking. Here, we harnessed a quantitative proteomics approach to screen for proteins binding to C. elegans telomeres, and identified TEBP-1 and TEBP-2, two paralogs that associate to telomeres in vitro and in vivo. TEBP-1 and TEBP-2 are expressed in the germline and during embryogenesis. tebp-1 and tebp-2 mutants display strikingly distinct phenotypes: tebp-1 mutants have longer telomeres than wild-type animals, while tebp-2 mutants display shorter telomeres and a mortal germline, a phenotype characterized by transgenerational germline deterioration. Notably, tebp-1; tebp-2 double mutant animals have synthetic sterility, with germlines showing signs of severe mitotic and meiotic arrest. TEBP-1 and TEBP-2 form a telomeric complex with the known single-stranded telomere-binding proteins POT-1, POT-2, and MRT-1. Furthermore, we find that POT-1 bridges the double- stranded binders TEBP-1 and TEBP-2, with the single-stranded binders POT-2 and MRT-1. These results describe the first telomere-binding complex in C. elegans, with TEBP-1 and TEBP-2, two double-stranded telomere binders required for fertility and that mediate opposite telomere dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Achieving health equity: from root causes to fair outcomes
Marmot, M. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61385-3 · Cited by 940
Alkire, S., & Santos, M. E. (2014) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.026 · Cited by 916
The Capability Approach in Practice*
Robeyns, I. (2006) · Journal of Political Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00263.x · Cited by 836
Whitehead, M., Pennington, A., Orton, L., Nayak, S., Petticrew, M., Sowden, A., & White, M. (2016) · Health & Place · doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2016.02.002 · Cited by 255
Ding, Q. J., & Hesketh, T. (2006) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38775.672662.80 · Cited by 185
Metadata
- Authors
- Amartya, S.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2003-12-04
- Volume
- 327
- Issue
- 7427
- Pages
- 1297-1298
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1607388525
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Missing women—revisited. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1297
- The paper
- Amartya, S. (2003). Missing women—revisited. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1297
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.