The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Wound dressings
Open accessAbstract
Traditionally wet-to-dry gauze has been used to dress wounds.Dressings that create and maintain a moist environment, however, are now considered to provide the optimal conditions for wound healing.Moisture under occlusive dressings not only increases the rate of epithelialisation but also promotes healing through moisture itself and the presence initially of a low oxygen tension (promoting the inflammatory phase).Gauze does not exhibit these properties; it may be disruptive to the healing wound as it dries and cause tissue damage when it is removed.It is not now widely used in the United Kingdom.Occlusive dressings are thought to increase cell proliferation and activity by retaining an optimum level of wound exudate, which contains vital proteins and cytokines produced in response to injury.These facilitate autolytic debridement of the wound and promote healing.Concerns of increased risk of infection under occlusive dressings have not been substantiated in clinical trials.This article describes wound dressings currently available in the UK. Low adherent dressingsLow adherent dressings are cheap and widely available.Their major function is to allow exudate to pass through into a secondary dressing while maintaining a moist wound bed.Most are manufactured in the form of tulles, which are open weave cloth soaked in soft paraffin or chlorhexidine; textiles; or multilayered or perforated plastic films.They are designed to reduce adherence at the wound bed and are particularly useful for patients with sensitive or fragile skin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products
Caló, E., & Khutoryanskiy, V. V. (2015) · European Polymer Journal · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024 · Cited by 2,634
Chronic Wound Healing: A Review of Current Management and Treatments
Han, G., & Ceilley, R. (2017) · Advances in Therapy · doi:10.1007/s12325-017-0478-y · Cited by 2,096
Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management
Zhang, M., & Zhao, X. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.311 · Cited by 616
Wound Dressings: Selecting the Most Appropriate Type
Broussard, K. C., & Powers, J. G. (2013) · American Journal of Clinical Dermatology · doi:10.1007/s40257-013-0046-4 · Cited by 310
Skin substitutes for acute and chronic wound healing: an updated review
Dai, C., Shih, S., & Khachemoune, A. (2020) · Journal of Dermatological Treatment · doi:10.1080/09546634.2018.1530443 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Jones, V., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-03-30
- Volume
- 332
- Issue
- 7544
- Pages
- 777-780
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2336886634
- Cited by
- 525
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound dressings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777
- The paper
- Jones, V., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G. (2006). Wound dressings. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.