Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 525

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Wound dressings

Open access
Jones, Vanessa, Grey, Joseph E, Harding, Keith G·2006·BMJ

Abstract

Traditionally wet-to-dry gauze has been used to dress wounds.Dressings that create and maintain a moist environment, however, are now considered to provide the optimal conditions for wound healing.Moisture under occlusive dressings not only increases the rate of epithelialisation but also promotes healing through moisture itself and the presence initially of a low oxygen tension (promoting the inflammatory phase).Gauze does not exhibit these properties; it may be disruptive to the healing wound as it dries and cause tissue damage when it is removed.It is not now widely used in the United Kingdom.Occlusive dressings are thought to increase cell proliferation and activity by retaining an optimum level of wound exudate, which contains vital proteins and cytokines produced in response to injury.These facilitate autolytic debridement of the wound and promote healing.Concerns of increased risk of infection under occlusive dressings have not been substantiated in clinical trials.This article describes wound dressings currently available in the UK. Low adherent dressingsLow adherent dressings are cheap and widely available.Their major function is to allow exudate to pass through into a secondary dressing while maintaining a moist wound bed.Most are manufactured in the form of tulles, which are open weave cloth soaked in soft paraffin or chlorhexidine; textiles; or multilayered or perforated plastic films.They are designed to reduce adherence at the wound bed and are particularly useful for patients with sensitive or fragile skin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 525

Metadata

Authors
Jones, V., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2006-03-30
Volume
332
Issue
7544
Pages
777-780
ISSN
  • 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
  • 1468-5833
OpenAlex
W2336886634
Cited by
525
References
0
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound dressings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777
The paper
Jones, V., Grey, J. E., & Harding, K. G. (2006). Wound dressings. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.