Prospective study of type 2 diabetes and cognitive decline in women aged 70-81 years
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of type 2 diabetes with baseline cognitive function and cognitive decline over two years of follow up, focusing on women living in the community and on the effects of treatments for diabetes. DESIGN: Nurses' health study in the United States. Two cognitive interviews were carried out by telephone during 1995-2003. PARTICIPANTS: 18 999 women aged 70-81 years who had been registered nurses completed the baseline interview; to date, 16 596 participants have completed follow up interviews after two years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive assessments included telephone interview of cognitive status, immediate and delayed recalls of the East Boston memory test, test of verbal fluency, delayed recall of 10 word list, and digit span backwards. Global scores were calculated by averaging the results of all tests with z scores. RESULTS: After multivariate adjustment, women with type 2 diabetes performed worse on all cognitive tests than women without diabetes at baseline. For example, women with diabetes were at 25-35% increased odds of poor baseline score (defined as bottom 10% of the distribution) compared with women without diabetes on the telephone interview of cognitive status and the global composite score (odds ratios 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.14 to 1.57, and 1.26, 1.06 to 1.51, respectively). Odds of poor cognition were particularly high for women who had had diabetes for a long time (1.52, 1.15 to 1.99, and 1.49, 1.11 to 2.00, respectively, for > or = 15 years' duration). In contrast, women with diabetes who were on oral hypoglycaemic agents performed similarly to women without diabetes (1.06 and 0.99), while women not using any medication had the greatest odds of poor performance (1.71, 1.28 to 2.281, and 1.45, 1.04 to 2.02) compared with women without diabetes. There was also a modest increase in odds of poor cognition among women using insulin treatment. All findings were similar when cognitive decline was examined over time. CONCLUSIONS: Women with type 2 diabetes had increased odds of poor cognitive function and substantial cognitive decline. Use of oral hypoglycaemic therapy, however, may ameliorate risk.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prospective epidemiological studies show a relationship between cognitive decline and clinical markers associated with hyperglycaemia (e.g., use of glucose-lowering medication, diabetes duration, diabetes complications).
“Finally, prospective epidemiological studies also show a relationship between cognitive decline and clinical markers associated with hyperglycaemia, e.g. use of glucose-lowering medication, diabetes duration and diabetes complications [46, 48, 49, 54, 56, 64].”
From Cognitive decline and dementia in diabetes—systematic overview of prospective observational studies (2005) · cites this paper as [46]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 33 · Cited by 190
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Giancarlo Logroscino associate professor of neuroepidemiology Channing Lab, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston Francine Grodstein associate professor of medicine Jae Hee Kang instructor of medicine Correspondence to: G Logroscino glogrosc@hsph.harvard.edu Papers page 6 of 6 BMJ Online First bmj.com on 20 August 2023 by guest. Protected by copyright. http://www.bmj.com/ BMJ: first published as 10.1136/bmj.37977.495729.EE on 23 February 2004. Downloaded from · DOI
- Authors
- Logroscino, G., Kang, J. H., & Grodstein, F.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Logroscino, Giancarlo
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2004-02-23
- Volume
- 328
- Issue
- 7439
- Pages
- 548
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC381043
- OpenAlex
- W2152038277
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 8.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (AG15424, R01AG015424)
- National Cancer Institute (CA-87969, P01CA087969)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- type 2 diabetes, cognitive decline, cognitive function, older women, oral antidiabetic drugs, insulin therapy, diabetes duration, memory, Nurses' Health Study, community-dwelling older adults
- MeSH terms
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Prospective Studies, Odds Ratio, Age of Onset
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review