Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study

Open access
Burgess, Caroline, Cornelius, Victoria, Love, Sharon, Graham, Jill, Richards, Michael, Ramirez, Amanda·2005·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of, and risk factors for, depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer in the five years after diagnosis. DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING: NHS breast clinic, London. PARTICIPANTS: 222 women with early breast cancer: 170 (77%) provided complete interview data up to either five years after diagnosis or recurrence. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of clinically important depression and anxiety (structured psychiatric interview with standardised diagnostic criteria) and clinical and patient risk factors, including stressful life experiences (Bedford College life events and difficulties schedule). RESULTS: Nearly 50% of the women with early breast cancer had depression, anxiety, or both in the year after diagnosis, 25% in the second, third, and fourth years, and 15% in the fifth year. Point prevalence was 33% at diagnosis, falling to 15% after one year. 45% of those with recurrence experienced depression, anxiety, or both within three months of the diagnosis. Previous psychological treatment predicted depression, anxiety, or both in the period around diagnosis (one month before diagnosis to four months after diagnosis). Longer term depression and anxiety, were associated with previous psychological treatment, lack of an intimate confiding relationship, younger age, and severely stressful non-cancer life experiences. Clinical factors were not associated with depression and anxiety, at any time. Lack of intimate confiding support also predicted more protracted episodes of depression and anxiety. CONCLUSION: Increased levels of depression, anxiety, or both in the first year after a diagnosis of early breast cancer highlight the need for dedicated service provision during this time. Psychological interventions for women with breast cancer who remain disease free should take account of the broader social context in which the cancer occurs, with a focus on improving social support.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.d3

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,334

Metadata

Authors
Burgess, C., Cornelius, V., Love, S., Graham, J., Richards, M., & Ramirez, A.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2005-02-04
Volume
330
Issue
7493
Pages
702
ISSN
  • 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
  • 0959-8138
OpenAlex
W2110108956
Cited by
1,334
References
1
FWCI
13.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.bmj.org/licenses/tdm/1.0/terms-and-conditions.html (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.d3
The paper
Burgess, C., Cornelius, V., Love, S., Graham, J., Richards, M., & Ramirez, A. (2005). Depression and anxiety in women with early breast cancer: five year observational cohort study. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.38343.670868.d3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.