The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Being big or growing fast: systematic review of size and growth in infancy and later obesity
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To assess the association between infant size or growth and subsequent obesity and to determine if any association has been stable over time. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, bibliographies of included studies, contact with first authors of included studies and other experts. INCLUSION CRITERIA: Studies that assessed the relation between infant size or growth during the first two years of life and subsequent obesity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Obesity at any age after infancy. RESULTS: 24 studies met the inclusion criteria (22 cohort and two case-control studies). Of these, 18 assessed the relation between infant size and subsequent obesity, most showing that infants who were defined as "obese" or who were at the highest end of the distribution for weight or body mass index were at increased risk of obesity. Compared with non-obese infants, in those who had been obese odds ratios or relative risks for subsequent obesity ranged from 1.35 to 9.38. Ten studies assessed the relation of infant growth with subsequent obesity and most showed that infants who grew more rapidly were at increased risk of obesity. Compared with other infants, in infants with rapid growth odds ratios and relative risks of later obesity ranged from 1.17 to 5.70. Associations were consistent for obesity at different ages and for people born over a period from 1927 to 1994. CONCLUSIONS: Infants who are at the highest end of the distribution for weight or body mass index or who grow rapidly during infancy are at increased risk of subsequent obesity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“whilst overly rapid growth and ‘catch-up’ growth are known risk factors for obesity [2–4].”
From Growth standard charts for monitoring bodyweight in intact domestic shorthair kittens from the USA (2022) · cites this paper as [3]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
2 retracted
Interventions for treating obesity in children
Oude Luttikhuis, H., Baur, L., Jansen, H., Shrewsbury, V. A., O'Malley, C., Stolk, R. P., & Summerbell, C. D. (2009) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001872.pub2 · Cited by 1,531
RetractedInterventions for treating obesity in children
Summerbell, C. D., Ashton, V. J., Campbell, K., Edmunds, L., Kelly, S. A., & Waters, E. B. (2003) · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001872 · Cited by 344
RetractedEstablishing a standard definition for child overweight and obesity worldwide: international survey
Cole, T. J. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7244.1240 · Cited by 16,500
Genetics of Food Intake Self-Regulation in Childhood: Literature Review and Research Opportunities
Faith, M. S., Carnell, S., & Kral, T. V. E. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353879 · Cited by 7,633
Predicting Obesity in Young Adulthood from Childhood and Parental Obesity
Whitaker, R. C., Wright, J. A., PEPE, M. S., Seidel, K. D., & Dietz, W. H. (1997) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199709253371301 · Cited by 4,433
Early life risk factors for obesity in childhood: cohort study
Reilly, J. J., Armstrong, J., Dorosty, A. R., Emmett, P. M., Ness, A., Rogers, I., Steer, C., & Sherriff, A. (2005) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.38470.670903.e0 · Cited by 1,675
Competing interests: none declared.
Hirsch, L. (2006) · Cited by 1,396
Childhood predictors of adult obesity: a systematic review.
Parsons, T. J., Power, C., Logan, S., & Summerbell, C. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 1,001
Rapid growth in infancy and childhood and obesity in later life – a systematic review
Monteiro, P. O. A., & Victora, C. G. (2005) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2005.00183.x · Cited by 911
The predictive value of childhood body mass index values for overweight at age 35 y
Guo, S., Roche, A., Chumlea, W., Gardner, J., & Siervogel, R. M. (1994) · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1093/ajcn/59.4.810 · Cited by 737
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Weight Gain During Pregnancy: Reexamining the Guidelines
Rasmussen, K. M., & Yaktine, A. L. (2009) · Cited by 4,052
Maternal and child undernutrition: consequences for adult health and human capital
Victora, C. G., Adair, L. S., Fall, C. H. D., Hallal, P. C., Martorell, R., Richter, L., & Sachdev, H. S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61692-4 · Cited by 4,229
The double burden of malnutrition: aetiological pathways and consequences for health
Wells, J. C., Sawaya, A. L., Wibaek, R., Mwangome, M., Poullas, M. S., Yajnik, C. S., & Demaio, A. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32472-9 · Cited by 993
Complementary Feeding: A Commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on Nutrition
Agostoni, C. V., Decsi, T., Fewtrell, M. S., Goulet, O., Kolaček, S., Koletzko, B. V., Michaelsen, K. F., Moreno, L. A., Puntis, J. W. L., Rigo, J., et al. (2008) · Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition · doi:10.1097/01.mpg.0000304464.60788.bd · Cited by 997
Rapid infancy weight gain and subsequent obesity: Systematic reviews and hopeful suggestions
Ong, K. K., & Loos, R. J. F. (2006) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1080/08035250600719754 · Cited by 841
Metadata
- Authors
- Baird, J., Fisher, D., Lucas, P., Kleijnen, J., Roberts, H., & Law, C.
- Affiliations
- Southampton General Hospital (GB)
- University of Bristol (GB)
- University of York (GB)
- City, University of London (GB)
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Baird, Janis
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2005-10-14
- Volume
- 331
- Issue
- 7522
- Pages
- 929
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- PMC
- PMC1261184
- OpenAlex
- W2106914915
- Cited by
- 1,185
- References
- 38
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 70 · 2017: 55 · 2016: 70 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 88 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 86
- FWCI
- 6.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (submittedVersion)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- University College London
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Risks and Factors
- Keywords
- infant obesity, infant growth, childhood obesity, adult obesity, body mass index, obesity risk factors, secular trends
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Body Weight, Child, Growth, Humans, Infant, Obesity, Body Mass Index, Risk Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review