The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact on outcomes in patients of the Evercare approach to case management of elderly people. DESIGN: Practice level before and after analysis of hospital admissions data with control group. SETTING: Nine primary care trusts in England that, in 2003-5, piloted case management of elderly people selected as being at high risk of emergency admission. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rates of emergency admission, emergency bed days, and mortality from April 2001 to March 2005 in 62 Evercare practices and 6960-7695 control practices in England (depending on the analysis being carried out). RESULTS: The intervention had no significant effect on rates of emergency admission (increase 16.5%, (95% confidence interval -5.7% to 38.7%), emergency bed days (increase 19.0%, -5.3% to 43.2%), and mortality (increase 34.4%, -1.7% to 70.3%) for a high risk population aged >65 with a history of two or more emergency admissions in the preceding 13 months. For the general population aged > or =65 effects on the rates of emergency admission (increase 2.5%, -2.1% to 7.0%), emergency bed days (decrease -4.9%, -10.8% to 1.0%), and mortality (increase 5.5%, -3.5% to 14.5%) were also non-significant. CONCLUSIONS: Case management of frail elderly people introduced an additional range of services into primary care without an associated reduction in hospital admissions. This may have been because of identification of additional cases. Employment of community matrons is now a key feature of case management policy in the NHS in England. Without more radical system redesign this policy is unlikely to reduce hospital admissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Brief Measure of Social Support: Practical and Theoretical Implications
Sarason, I. G., Sarason, B. R., Shearin, E. N., & Pierce, G. R. (1987) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407587044007 · Cited by 1,977
Comprehensive geriatric assessment: a meta-analysis of controlled trials
Stuck, A. E., Siu, A. L., Wieland, G. D., Rubenstein, L. Z., & Adams, J. (1993) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/0140-6736(93)92884-v · Cited by 1,974
Cited by
Beswick, A. D., Rees, K., Dieppe, P., Ayis, S., Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Ebrahim, S. (2008) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)60342-6 · Cited by 780
The effects of integrated care: a systematic review of UK and international evidence
Baxter, S., Johnson, M., Chambers, D., Sutton, A., Goyder, E., & Booth, A. (2018) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3161-3 · Cited by 678
A systematic review of different models of home and community care services for older persons
Low, L.-F., Yap, M., & Brodaty, H. (2011) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-11-93 · Cited by 310
Gaugler, J. E. (2016) · Handbook of Aging and the Social Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-417235-7.00020-2 · Cited by 28
A Theoretical Lens for Revealing the Complexity of Chronic Care
Borgermans, L., De Maeseneer, J., Wollersheim, H., Vrijhoef, B., & Devroey, D. (2013) · Perspectives in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1353/pbm.2013.0017 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravelle, H., Dusheiko, M., Sheaff, R., Sargent, P., Boaden, R., Pickard, S., Parker, S., & Roland, M.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2006-11-15
- Volume
- 334
- Issue
- 7583
- Pages
- 31
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2077851275
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 46.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39020.413310.55
- The paper
- Gravelle, H., Dusheiko, M., Sheaff, R., Sargent, P., Boaden, R., Pickard, S., Parker, S., & Roland, M. (2007). Impact of case management (Evercare) on frail elderly patients: controlled before and after analysis of quantitative outcome data. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39020.413310.55
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.