The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of respiratory morbidity in term infants delivered by elective caesarean section: cohort study
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between elective caesarean sections and neonatal respiratory morbidity and the importance of timing of elective caesarean sections. DESIGN: Cohort study with prospectively collected data from the Aarhus birth cohort, Denmark. SETTING: Obstetric department and neonatal department of a university hospital in Denmark. PARTICIPANTS: All liveborn babies without malformations, with gestational ages between 37 and 41 weeks, and delivered between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 2006 (34 458 babies). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Respiratory morbidity (transitory tachypnoea of the newborn, respiratory distress syndrome, persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn) and serious respiratory morbidity (oxygen therapy for more than two days, nasal continuous positive airway pressure, or need for mechanical ventilation). RESULTS: 2687 infants were delivered by elective caesarean section. Compared with newborns intended for vaginal delivery, an increased risk of respiratory morbidity was found for infants delivered by elective caesarean section at 37 weeks' gestation (odds ratio 3.9, 95% confidence interval 2.4 to 6.5), 38 weeks' gestation (3.0, 2.1 to 4.3), and 39 weeks' gestation (1.9, 1.2 to 3.0). The increased risks of serious respiratory morbidity showed the same pattern but with higher odds ratios: a fivefold increase was found at 37 weeks (5.0, 1.6 to16.0). These results remained essentially unchanged after exclusion of pregnancies complicated by diabetes, pre-eclampsia, and intrauterine growth retardation, or by breech presentation. CONCLUSION: Compared with newborns delivered vaginally or by emergency caesarean sections, those delivered by elective caesarean section around term have an increased risk of overall and serious respiratory morbidity. The relative risk increased with decreasing gestational age.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour
Ullman, R., Smith, L. A., Burns, E., Mori, R., & Dowswell, T. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007396.pub2 · Cited by 139
The natural caesarean: a woman‐centred technique
Smith, J., Plaat, F., & Fisk, N. (2008) · BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology · doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01777.x · Cited by 109
Caesarean section: impact on mother and child
Boutsikou, T., & Malamitsi‐Puchner, A. (2011) · Acta Paediatrica · doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02477.x · Cited by 56
Prediger, B., Mathes, T., Polus, S., Glatt, A., Bühn, S., Schiermeier, S., Neugebauer, E. A. M., & Pieper, D. (2020) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-020-03036-1 · Cited by 16
Short report: Post-operative wound infections after the gentle caesarean section
Bronsgeest, K., Wolters, V. E. R. A., Freeman, L. M., te Pas, A. B., Kreijen-Meinesz, J. H., & Boers, K. E. (2019) · European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.03.002 · Cited by 9
Fernandes, J. Z., Pizzinatto, N. L., Santos, G. L. C., Name, B. D. H., & Ruszczyk, G. B. (2026) · International Health Sciences Review · doi:10.70164/ihsr.v2i2.167
Metadata
- Authors
- Hansen, A. K., Wisborg, K., Uldbjerg, N., & Henriksen, T. B.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2007-12-11
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7635
- Pages
- 85-87
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2128123453
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.