The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine if there is a relation between aspirin "resistance" and clinical outcomes in patients with cardiovascular disease. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCE: Electronic literature search without language restrictions of four databases and hand search of bibliographies for other relevant articles. REVIEW METHODS: Inclusion criteria included a test for platelet responsiveness and clinical outcomes. Aspirin resistance was assessed, using a variety of platelet function assays. RESULTS: 20 studies totalling 2930 patients with cardiovascular disease were identified. Most studies used aspirin regimens, ranging from 75-325 mg daily, and six studies included adjunct antiplatelet therapy. Compliance was confirmed directly in 14 studies and by telephone or interviews in three. Information was insufficient to assess compliance in three studies. Overall, 810 patients (28%) were classified as aspirin resistant. A cardiovascular related event occurred in 41% of patients (odds ratio 3.85, 95% confidence interval 3.08 to 4.80), death in 5.7% (5.99, 2.28 to 15.72), and an acute coronary syndrome in 39.4% (4.06, 2.96 to 5.56). Aspirin resistant patients did not benefit from other antiplatelet treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients who are resistant to aspirin are at a greater risk of clinically important cardiovascular morbidity long term than patients who are sensitive to aspirin.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology<SUBTITLE>A Proposal for Reporting</SUBTITLE>
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623
A comparison of methods to detect publication bias in meta‐analysis
Macaskill, P., Walter, S. D., & Irwig, L. (2001) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.698 · Cited by 1,286
Cited by
Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package
Viechtbauer, W. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v036.i03 · Cited by 20,464
Guthikonda, S., Alviar, C. L., Vaduganathan, M., Arikan, M., Tellez, A., DeLao, T., Granada, J. F., Dong, J.-F., Kleiman, N. S., & Lev, E. I. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.05.031 · Cited by 337
Diabetes and Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Ferreiro, J. L., & Angiolillo, D. J. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.109.913376 · Cited by 333
Guideline for investigation and management of adults and children presenting with a thrombocytosis
Harrison, C. N., Bareford, D., Butt, N., Campbell, P., Conneally, E., Drummond, M., Erber, W., Everington, T., Green, A. R., Hall, G. W., et al. (2010) · British Journal of Haematology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2141.2010.08122.x · Cited by 317
Immature platelets in patients with acute coronary syndromes
Hvas, A.-M., Kristensen, S. D., & Grove, E. L. (2009) · Thrombosis and Haemostasis · doi:10.1160/th08-03-0186 · Cited by 202
Metadata
- Authors
- Krasopoulos, G., Brister, S. J., Beattie, W. S., & Buchanan, M. R.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2008-01-17
- Volume
- 336
- Issue
- 7637
- Pages
- 195-198
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W1988143463
- Cited by
- 708
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.39430.529549.be
- The paper
- Krasopoulos, G., Brister, S. J., Beattie, W. S., & Buchanan, M. R. (2008). Aspirin “resistance” and risk of cardiovascular morbidity: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39430.529549.be
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.