Reporting of sample size calculation in randomised controlled trials: review

Cited by (274)

Items 201–274 of 274

  1. Reporting of various methodological and statistical parameters in negative studies published in prominent Indian Medical Journals
    Jaykaran Charan, Deepak B. Saxena · 2014 · Journal of Postgraduate Medicine
  2. Diagnosis checking of statistical analysis in RCT s indexed in PubMed
    Paul Hong Lee, Andy C. Y. Tse · 2017 · European Journal of Clinical Investigation
  3. Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study
    Kim Jachno, Stephane R. Heritier, Rory S Wolfe · 2021 · BMC Medical Research Methodology
  4. Identifying trends in reporting on the ethical treatment of insects in research
    Craig D. Perl, Cat Kissinger, Rebekah Keating Godfrey, Enrique Castillo, Bob Fischer, Meghan Barrett · 2024
  5. Conditional versus expected power in trial design: the concept of assurance illustrated in mortality trials
    Markus Huber · 2026 · British Journal of Anaesthesia
  6. Sample-size determination and adherence in randomised controlled trials published in anaesthetic journals
    M Nontshe, Sajidah Khan, T Mandebvu, B Merrifield, Reitze Nils Rodseth · 2018 · Southern African Journal of Anaesthesia and Analgesia
  7. Sample size estimation practices in research protocols submitted to Danish scientific ethics committees
    Marius Mølsted Flege, Simon Francis Thomsen · 2018 · Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
  8. Systematic Review of Volume and Methodological Quality of Randomized Trials in Acute Pancreatitis
    Nejo Joseph, Gordon Xin Hua Liu, Chris Varghese, Wei Boon Lim, William Xu, Cameron Iain Wells, Shayne Tobias, Gabriele Capurso, Enrique de‐Madaria, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes et al. · 2024 · Pancreas
  9. Effects of structured positive feedback intervention on standing reach ability among older adults admitted to a convalescent rehabilitation ward: a small-sample pilot randomized controlled trial
    Hiroyuki Uchida, Akina Miki, Akane Ida, Takumi Igusa, Kazuki Hirao · 2024 · European Geriatric Medicine
  10. Alleviating small sample problem in continuous forest monitoring with remote sensing-assisted Copulas
    Xinjie Cheng, Zhengyang Hou, Annika Susanna Kangas, Jean-Pierre Renaud, Hao Tang, Weisheng Zeng, Qing Xu · 2025 · Ecological Indicators
  11. “Fighting against malaria is everyone’s concern”: a randomized control trial assessing the role of incentives for encouraging local communities to record and upload mosquito sounds using the MozzWear application
    Winifrida P. Mponzi, Rinita Dam, Dickson Msaky, Yohana A. Mwalugelo, Marianne E Sinka, Ivan Kiskin, Eva Herreros-Moya, Stephen Roberts, Kathy Willis, Emmanuel Wilson Kaindoa · 2025 · Malaria Journal
  12. Failure of Cardiovascular Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trials to Report Pre-trial and Post-trial Parameters: a Cross-sectional Analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov
    Alexander R. Zheutlin, Joshua D. Niforatos, Eric Lee Stulberg, Jeremy B. Sussman · 2020 · Journal of General Internal Medicine
  13. Examining the Advantages and Disadvantages of Pilot Studies: Monte-Carlo Simulations
    Masato Nakazawa · 2012 · UNM’s Digital Repository (University of New Mexico)
  14. Planning and interpreting the sample size of trials with multiple outcomes
    Spyridon N. Papageorgiou · 2019 · Journal of Orthodontics
  15. Rétractation
    Pierre‐François Dequin · 2011 · Réanimation
  16. Non-inferiority in cancer clinical trials was associated with more lenient margins and higher hypothesized outcome event rates
    Yazhou He, Chi Shu, Ting Li, Qingbin Wu, Ziqiang Wang, Xin Chen, Xia Shen · 2021 · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  17. A systematic review of interventions on body image and disordered eating outcomes among women in midlife
    Helena Lewis‐Smith, Phillippa C. Diedrichs, Nichola Rumsey, Diana M. Harcourt · 2016 · International Journal of Eating Disorders
  18. Guidance on minimally important clinical difference and trial size is needed
    Jonathan Alistair Cook, Craig Robert Ramsay, Luke David Vale, On behalf of the DELTA project group · 2011 · BMJ
  19. Reply to: a sandwich technique (N&H variation technique) to reduce blood loss during cesarean delivery for complete placenta previa
    Hany F. Sallam, Nahla W. Shady · 2018 · The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine
  20. Statistical characteristics of analytical studies published in Peruvian medical journals from 2021 to 2022: A methodological study
    Natalia Nombera-Aznaran, David Guevara-Lazo, Daniel Fernandez‐Guzman, Álvaro Taype-Rondán · 2024 · PLoS ONE
  21. An analysis of sample size calculations in randomized control trials in emergency medicine
    Önder Limon, Nurettın Özgür Doğan, Gülsüm Limon, Ersin Aksay · 2025 · The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
  22. Glaucoma Diagnosis in Randomized Trials: Variability and the Need for Standardization
    Iden Amiri, Vincent Duong Tang, Jean-Claude Mwanza, Gabriella Szatmáry, David Fleischman · 2025 · Journal of Glaucoma
  23. Diffractive optical element (D.O.E) spectacle lenses for myopia prevention and control: a small-scale pilot study among younger Chinese children
    Xiaofeng Zhu, Qiurong Lin, Tao Sun, Wenbo Yao, Meng Chen, Wenying Xu · 2026 · BMJ Open Ophthalmology
  24. Digital Phenotyping in Health Research: Scoping Review of Methods, Gaps, and Opportunities
    Nolwenn Badier, Andrée Lafitte, Audrey Difernand, Gloria Aguayo, Guy Fagherazzi, Jukka-Pekka “JP” Onnela, Benjamin Vittrant, Bastien Lechat, Quentin De Larochelambert, Jean‐François Toussaint et al. · 2026 · Journal of Medical Internet Research
  25. The historical development of sample size estimation: from Huygens and Bernoulli to the present
    Kristian Thorlund, Christian Gluud · 2026 · Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
  26. Must do better
    J. D Mayer · 2009 · BMJ
  27. Le calcul d’effectif dans les essais randomisés : ce que le clinicien doit savoir
    Emmanuel G. Simon, C.-J. Fouché, F. Perrotin · 2012 · Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité
  28. Clinical Outcomes Evaluation and Quality Improvement
    Tamara N. Fitzgerald, R. Lawrence Moss · 2012 · Elsevier eBooks
  29. Poor sample size reporting quality and insufficient sample size in economic evaluations conducted alongside pragmatic trials: a cross-sectional survey
    Changjin Wu, Jun Hao, Xin Yu, Ruomeng Song, Wentan Li, Ling Zuo, Xiyan Zhang, Yuanyi Cai, Huazhang Wu, Wen Hui · 2024 · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  30. Beyond statistical power in designing clinical trials: Shiny/R apps to the rescue
    Pedro Sandoval, Ester Vilaprinyó, Rui Alves, Albert Sorribas B · 2025 · Teaching Statistics
  31. Statistics in veterinary nursing research: what to know before starting the study
    João R. Mesquita, Cármen Nóbrega, Helena Vala, SIV Sousa · 2012 · The Veterinary Nurse
  32. Einfluss des Impact-Faktors auf das Berichten einer Fallzahlplanung in Publikationen zu Studien am Beispiel der AMD-Therapie
    Sabrina Tulka, Berit Geis, Stephanie Knippschild, Christine Baulig, Frank Krummenauer · 2019 · Der Ophthalmologe
  33. Einfluss des Impact-Faktors auf das Berichten einer Fallzahlplanung in Publikationen zu Studien am Beispiel der AMD-Therapie: Querschnittuntersuchung zum Vorliegen von Fallzahlplanungen in Publikationen von RCTs zur AMD-Therapie in Zeitschriften mit hohem und niedrigem Impact-Faktor
    Sabrina Tulka, Berit Geis, Stephanie Knippschild, Christine Baulig, Frank Krummenauer · 2020 · Der Ophthalmologe
  34. Have You Got the Power? Why Statistical Power Calculations Are Critical to Research Design
    Serena Laura Orr, Andrew D. Hershey · 2018 · Headache The Journal of Head and Face Pain
  35. Clinical Trials
    Thomas P. Ryan · 2013 · Wiley series in probability and statistics
  36. Current Technology Developments Can Improve the Quality of Research and Level of Evidence for Rehabilitation Interventions
    Bruno Bonnechère, Annick A. A. Timmermans, Sarah Michiels · 2022 · Preprints.org
  37. Methods and Outcomes Reporting in Exercise-Based Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Research: a cross-sectional analysis
    G. W. Freccia, R. Z. dos Santos, L. De Lucca, A. Körbes, T. Carvalho · 2022 · medRxiv
  38. How to Read a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
    Matthew J. Grainge · 2014 · Wiley eBooks
  39. The most effective surgical treatment option for congenital hydrocephalus: a review
    Diana Warren · 2011 · British Journal of Neuroscience Nursing
  40. How should a clinician interpret results of randomized controlled trials?
    Virginijus Šapoka, Vytautas Kasiulevičius, Janina DIDŽIAPETRIENĖ · 2010 · Acta medica Lituanica
  41. What Should Be the Ideal Control Group in Clinical Trials Investigating the Role of Varicocele and Its Treatment on Fertility Outcomes?
    Renata Cristina de Carvalho, Renato Fraietta · 2019 · Springer eBooks
  42. Incorporating external evidence syntheses in the design and analysis of trials
    Gemma Clayton · 2019 · Bristol Research (University of Bristol)
  43. Choosing the Target Difference (“effect size”) for a Randomised Controlled Trial - DELTA2 Guidance
    Jonathan Alistair Cook, Steven A. Julious, William R. Sones, Lisa V. Hampson, Catherine Elizabeth Hewitt, Jesse A. Berlin, Deborah Ashby, Richard Emsley, Dean A. Fergusson, Stephen J. Walters et al. · 2018 · Preprints.org
  44. Ensayo clínico aleatorizado
    Jesús Bollo, Sonia Fernández–Ananín, Eduardo M. Targarona · 2021 · Cirugía Española
  45. Peer Review #3 of "Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  46. Peer Review #2 of "Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  47. Peer Review #1 of "Deficiencies of effectiveness of intervention studies in veterinary medicine: a cross-sectional survey of ten leading veterinary and medical journals (v0.1)"
    2016 · PeerJ
  48. Randomized clinical trial
    Jesús Bollo, Sonia Fernández–Ananín, Eduardo M. Targarona · 2022 · Cirugía Española (English Edition)
  49. Apriori sample size estimation and reporting in original articles published from 2012 to 2020 in two Asian orthodontic journals
    Shivangi Ramteke, Sekar Santhosh Kumar, Balasubramanian Madhan · 2022 · Journal of Orthodontic Science
  50. Non-pharmacological Interventions for Mental Disorders
    2024 · Frontiers research topics
  51. Risk of Editorial Bias: A Case Study of Factors Contributing to Review Time in a Leading Journal in Dentistry
    M. Atieh, Nabeel H. M. Alsabeeha · 2025 · Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
  52. Adaptive Clinical Trials and Sample Size Determination in the Presence of Measurement Error and Heterogeneity
    Hassan Farooq, Sajid Ali, Ismail Shah, Ibrahim Nafisah, Mohammed M. A. Almazah · 2025 · Stats
  53. Sample Size Estimation: Ten Frequently Unanswered Questions
    Kamyar Moradi, John Eng · 2025 · Radiology
  54. Leveraging density ratio models in a binary instrumental variable inference with a binary outcome: A retrospective approach
    Wenli Liu, Jing Qin, Yukun Liu · 2025 · Statistical Theory and Related Fields
  55. Enhancing the academic performance of students through an online learning system: A case study of Makurumla Secondary School, Tanzania
    Godfrey Chacha, Respickius Olifage Casmir · 2025 · African Journal of Empirical Research
  56. Statistical Power in Musculoskeletal Research: A Meta-Review of 266 Randomised Controlled Trials
    Chris Bleakley, Natalie Klempel, Jente Wagemans, Fredh Netterström-Wedin, James M. Smoliga · 2025 · Sports Medicine - Open
  57. The role of research ethics committees in addressing optimism in sample size calculations: a meta-epidemiological study
    Marieke Sophie Jansen, Rolf H. H. Groenwold, Olaf M. Dekkers · 2025 · Research Integrity and Peer Review
  58. Additional file 1 of Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study
    Kim Jachno, Heritier, Stephane, Rory Wolfe · 2021 · Figshare
  59. Additional file 1 of Major mistakes or errors in the use of trial sequential analysis in systematic reviews or meta-analyses – the METSA systematic review
    Christian Gunge Riberholt, Olsen, Markus Harboe, Joachim Birch Milan, Sigurlaug Hanna Hafliðadóttir, Jeppe Houmann Svanholm, Elisabeth Buck Pedersen, Charles Chin Han Lew, Mark Aninakwah Asante, Pereira Ribeiro, Johanne, Vibeke Wagner et al. · 2024 · Figshare
  60. Additional file 2 of Impact of a non-constant baseline hazard on detection of time-dependent treatment effects: a simulation study
    Kim Jachno, Heritier, Stephane, Rory Wolfe · 2021 · Figshare
  61. Additional file 1 of Current practice in analysing and reporting binary outcome data—a review of randomised controlled trial reports
    Ines Rombach, R Knight, Nicholas Peckham, Stokes, Jamie R., Cook, Jonathan A. · 2020 · Figshare
  62. Additional file 1 of A descriptive study of samples sizes used in agreement studies published in the PubMed repository
    Oscar Han, Hao Wei Tan, Julious, Steven, Sutton, Laura, Jacques, Richard, Lee, Ellen, Lewis, Jen, Walters, Stephen · 2022 · Figshare
  63. Additional file 2 of Current practice in analysing and reporting binary outcome data—a review of randomised controlled trial reports
    Ines Rombach, R Knight, Nicholas Peckham, Stokes, Jamie R., Cook, Jonathan A. · 2020 · Figshare
  64. Protocol for a review of statistical methods used to estimate risk ratios and risk differences in parallel cluster randomised trials
    Jack J. Hall, Sam Watson, Jon Bishop, Yixin Wang, Julia F Shaw, Monica Taljaard, Karla Hemming · 2026 · Trials
  65. Modifiable methodological and reporting practices are associated with reproducibility of health sciences research: a systematic review and evidence and gap map
    Juliane Kennett, Stephana J. Moss, Jeanna Parsons Leigh, Niklas Bobrovitz, Henry T. Stelfox · 2026 · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  66. Reporting quality and risk of bias in randomized controlled trials of rotavirus vaccines
    Jiyoung Kim, Juhee Cho · 2026 · Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research
  67. Scaffolding Responsible Software Use: Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Causal Inference Tool
    George Perrett, Jennifer Hill, Anugya Srivastava, Marc A. Scott · 2026 · The American Statistician
  68. Comparative efficacy of transdermal buprenorphine versus diclofenac in the management of knee osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial with network pharmacology insights
    Abhay Kumar Singh, Sneha Yadav, Anil Kumar Gulia, Shivani Singh, Sanjeev Bansal, Prem Shankar Gupta, Soniya Rani · 2026 · Inflammopharmacology
  69. The rational use of available evidence before extrapolating the benefit risk ratio from adults to children
    P. Janiaud · 2017
  70. Intérêt d'une approche de type "méta-analyse prospective d'essais de taille fixe" dans l'évaluation thérapeutique
    Elsa Tavernier · 2016 · theses.fr (ABES)
  71. Reporting and accuracy of sample size calculations in orthodontic trials, focusing on standard deviation assumptions: A meta-epidemiologic review
    Sajjad Alipour Shoari, Nikolaos Pandis, Aydin Sohrabi · 2026 · American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics
  72. Contemporary Chemotherapy Benchmarks for Molecularly Defined Advanced NSCLC: Reconstructed Individual Patient-Level Data of 22 Randomized Trials
    Deborah Di-Xin Zhou, Sarah J Lord, Frank Lin, Thomas John, Robert John Simes, Chee Khoon Lee · 2026 · Lung
  73. Current state of Russian rcts in anesthesiology and intensive care: methodological characteristics and statistical fragility of mortality outcomes (a systematic review)
    Mikhail Ya. Yadgarov, Берикашвили Леван Бондоевич, Valery V. Likhvantsev · 2026 · Russian Journal of Anesthesiology and Reanimatology
  74. Reporting quality assessment of sham acupuncture randomized controlled trials for acupuncture intervention in glaucoma
    Yi-Fan Lei, Xin-Yun Huang, Shi-yong Xue, Yao-Jia-Ni Cao, Xue-Jun Wang, Can Yang, Jue Hong, Xiaopeng Ma · 2026 · Complementary Therapies in Medicine