The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the risk of colorectal cancer after screening with flexible sigmoidoscopy. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Population based screening in two areas in Norway-city of Oslo and Telemark county (urban and mixed urban and rural populations). PARTICIPANTS: 55 736 men and women aged 55-64 years. INTERVENTION: Once only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening with or without a single round of faecal occult blood testing (n=13 823) compared with no screening (n=41 913). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Planned end points were cumulative incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer after 5, 10, and 15 years. This first report from the study presents cumulative incidence after 7 years of follow-up and hazard ratio for mortality after 6 years. RESULTS: No difference was found in the 7 year cumulative incidence of colorectal cancer between the screening and control groups (134.5 v 131.9 cases per 100 000 person years). In intention to screen analysis, a trend towards reduced colorectal cancer mortality was found (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.47 to 1.13, P=0.16). For attenders compared with controls, a statistically significant reduction in mortality was apparent for both total colorectal cancer (hazard ratio 0.41, 0.21 to 0.82, P=0.011) and rectosigmoidal cancer (0.24, 0.08 to 0.76, P=0.016). CONCLUSIONS: A reduction in incidence of colorectal cancer with flexible sigmoidoscopy screening could not be shown after 7 years' follow-up. Mortality from colorectal cancer was not significantly reduced in the screening group but seemed to be lower for attenders, with a reduction of 59% for any location of colorectal cancer and 76% for rectosigmoidal cancer in per protocol analysis, an analysis prone to selection bias. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical trials NCT00119912.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy
Nishihara, R., Wu, K., Lochhead, P., Morikawa, T., Liao, X., Qian, Z. R., Inamura, K., Kim, S. A., Kuchiba, A., Yamauchi, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301969 · Cited by 1,483
Lin, J. S., Bowles, E. J. A., Williams, S. B., & Morrison, C. C. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.0562 · Cited by 1,082
Colorectal-Cancer Incidence and Mortality with Screening Flexible Sigmoidoscopy
Schoen, R. E., Pinsky, P. F., Weissfeld, J. L., Yokochi, L. A., Church, T., Laiyemo, A. O., Bresalier, R., Andriole, G. L., Buys, S. S., Crawford, E. D., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1114635 · Cited by 1,021
Lin, J. S., Perdue, L. A., Henrikson, N. B., Bean, S. I., & Blasi, P. R. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.4417 · Cited by 650
Brenner, H., Chang–Claude, J., Jansen, L., Knebel, P., Stock, C., & Hoffmeister, M. (2014) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2013.09.001 · Cited by 339
Metadata
- Authors
- Hoff, G., Grotmol, T., Skovlund, E., Bretthauer, M., & for the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention Study Group
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-05-29
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- may29 2
- Pages
- b1846-b1846
- ISSN
- 0007-1447 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- 1468-5833
- OpenAlex
- W2042113764
- Cited by
- 311
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 18.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.b1846
- The paper
- Hoff, G., Grotmol, T., Skovlund, E., Bretthauer, M., & for the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention Study Group. (2009). Risk of colorectal cancer seven years after flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b1846
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.