The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify modifiable factors that influence relatives' decision to allow organ donation. DESIGN: Systematic review. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and CINAHL, without language restriction, searched to April 2008. Review methods Three authors independently assessed the eligibility of the identified studies. We excluded studies that examined only factors affecting consent that could not be altered, such as donor ethnicity. We extracted quantitative results to an electronic database. For data synthesis, we summarised the results of studies comparing similar themes. RESULTS: We included 20 observational studies and audits. There were no randomised controlled trials. The main factors associated with reduced rates of refusal were the provision of adequate information on the process of organ donation and its benefits; high quality of care of potential organ donors; ensuring relatives had a clear understanding of brain stem death; separating the request for organ donation from notification that the patient had died; making the request in a private setting; and using trained and experienced individuals to make the request. CONCLUSIONS: Limited evidence suggests that there are modifiable factors in the process of requests for organ donation, in particular the skills of the individual making the request and the timing of this conversation, that might have a significant impact on rates of consent. Targeting these factors might have a greater and more immediate effect on the number of organs for donation than legislative or other long term strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breaking bad news. A review of the literature
Ptacek, J. T. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.276.6.496 · Cited by 538
VandeKieft, G. K. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 428
Impact of presumed consent for organ donation on donation rates: a systematic review
Rithalia, A., McDaid, C., Suekarran, S., Myers, L., & Sowden, A. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.a3162 · Cited by 340
Breaking bad news. A review of the literature.
Ptacek, J. T., & Eberhardt, T. L. (1996) · PubMed · Cited by 182
Cited by
Are the public ready for organ donation after out of hospital cardiac arrest?
Bruce, C. M., Reed, M. J., & MacDougall, M. (2013) · Emergency Medicine Journal · doi:10.1136/emermed-2012-201135 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Simpkin, A. L., Robertson, L. C., Barber, V. S., & Young, J. D.
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-04-21
- Volume
- 338
- Issue
- apr21 2
- Pages
- b991-b991
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2070953265
- Cited by
- 310
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.b991
- The paper
- Simpkin, A. L., Robertson, L. C., Barber, V. S., & Young, J. D. (2009). Modifiable factors influencing relatives' decision to offer organ donation: systematic review. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b991
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.