The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
One year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of initial low energy permissive underfeeding ("trophic feeding") versus full energy enteral feeding ("full feeding") on physical function and secondary outcomes in patients with acute lung injury. DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal follow-up evaluation of the NHLBI ARDS Clinical Trials Network's EDEN trial SETTING: 41hospitals in the United States. PARTICIPANTS: 525 patients with acute lung injury. INTERVENTIONS: Randomised assignment to trophic or full feeding for up to six days; thereafter, all patients still receiving mechanical ventilation received full feeding. MEASUREMENTS: Blinded assessment of the age and sex adjusted physical function domain of the SF-36 instrument at 12 months after acute lung injury. Secondary outcome measures included survival; physical, psychological, and cognitive functioning; quality of life; and employment status at six and 12 months. RESULTS: After acute lung injury, patients had substantial physical, psychological, and cognitive impairments, reduced quality of life, and impaired return to work. Initial trophic versus full feeding did not affect mean SF-36 physical function at 12 months (55 (SD 33) v 55 (31), P=0.54), survival to 12 months (65% v 63%, P=0.63), or nearly all of the secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: In survivors of acute lung injury, there was no difference in physical function, survival, or multiple secondary outcomes at 6 and 12 month follow-up after initial trophic or full enteral feeding. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT No 00719446.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x · Cited by 47,139
EuroQol: a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life
(1990) · Health Policy · doi:10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9 · Cited by 15,736
(2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005043421801 · Cited by 12,941
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
Wasserman, S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,326
(2001) · Statistics for Psychologists · doi:10.4324/9781410605542-11 · Cited by 6,877
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
(2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa062200 · Cited by 3,538
The Impact of Event Scale: Revised
Weiss, D. S. (2007) · International and Cultural Psychology Series · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-70990-1_10 · Cited by 2,996
Functional Disability 5 Years after Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Herridge, M. S., Tansey, C. M., Matté, A., Tomlinson, G., Diaz-Granados, N., Cooper, A., Guest, C. B., Mazer, C. D., Mehta, S., Stewart, T. E., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1011802 · Cited by 2,847
Needham, D. M., Davidson, J., Cohen, H., Hopkins, R. O., Weinert, C., Wunsch, H., Zawistowski, C., Bemis-Dougherty, A., Berney, S. C., Bienvenu, O. J., et al. (2012) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0b013e318232da75 · Cited by 2,639
Self-citationLong-term cognitive impairment and functional disability among survivors of severe sepsis.
Iwashyna, T. J., Ely, E. W., Smith, D. M., & Langa, K. M. (2010) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2010.1553 · Cited by 2,582
Cited by
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6 · Cited by 6,621
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016.
Rhodes, A., Evans, L. E., Alhazzani, W., Levy, M. M., Antonelli, M., Ferrer, R., Kumar, A., Sevransky, J. E., Sprung, C. L., Nunnally, M. E., et al. (2017) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/ccm.0000000000002255 · Cited by 3,652
Acute skeletal muscle wasting in critical illness
Puthucheary, Z. A., Rawal, J., McPhail, M., Connolly, B., Ratnayake, G., Chan, P., Hopkinson, N. S., Padhke, R., Dew, T., Sidhu, P. S., et al. (2013) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2013.278481 · Cited by 2,103
Early enteral nutrition in critically ill patients: ESICM clinical practice guidelines
ESICM Working Group on Gastrointestinal Function, Reintam Blaser, A., Starkopf, J., Alhazzani, W., Berger, M. M., Casaer, M. P., Deane, A. M., Fruhwald, S., Hiesmayr, M., Ichai, C., et al. (2017) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-016-4665-0 · Cited by 837
Clinical review: intensive care unit acquired weakness
Hermans, G., & Van den Berghe, G. (2015) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/s13054-015-0993-7 · Cited by 792
Metadata
- Authors
- Needham, D. M., Dinglas, V. D., Bienvenu, O. J., Colantuoni, E., Wozniak, A. W., Rice, T. W., Hopkins, R. O., & for the NIH NHLBI ARDS Network
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2013-03-19
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- mar19 3
- Pages
- f1532-f1532
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1974798003
- Cited by
- 276
- References
- 65
- FWCI
- 25.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: One year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/bmj.f1532
- The paper
- Needham, D. M., Dinglas, V. D., Bienvenu, O. J., Colantuoni, E., Wozniak, A. W., Rice, T. W., Hopkins, R. O., & for the NIH NHLBI ARDS Network. (2013). One year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1532
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
