Cited by 7Pharmaceutical industry and healthcareEthics in Clinical ResearchAcademic Publishing and Open Access

NHS research authority links approval of trials to registration and publication of results

Kmietowicz, Z.·2013·BMJ

Abstract

Campaigners for transparency of all clinical trial data have welcomed plans set out by the body that oversees research standards in the NHS for the registration of trials and the publication of their results. The new commitments from the NHS Health Research Authority follow a meeting of stakeholders held on 25 April.1 The proposals include granting ethics approval for clinical trials from September 2013 only to researchers who have agreed a timeframe to register their trial. The authority was set up in December 2011 to promote and protect the interests of patients in health research. It has said that it would …

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f3119

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the United Kingdom, registration is now a requirement for all clinical trials before approval from UK ethics committees.

    “Registration ensures transparency and accountability and in the United Kingdom is now a requirement for all clinical trials before approval from UK ethics committees.87 88”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kmietowicz, Z.
Affiliations
BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Kmietowicz, Z.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-05-15
Volume
346
Issue
may15 1
Pages
f3119-f3119
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313985179
Cited by
7
References
0
Citations by year
2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
Keywords
clinical trial registration, research ethics approval, research transparency, clinical trial data
MeSH terms
Clinical Trials as Topic, United Kingdom, Humans, Publishing, Registries, State Medicine, Ethics Committees, Research, Ethics, Research, Research Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review