Cited by 525Statistical Methods in EpidemiologyPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsAdvanced Causal Inference Techniques

Self controlled case series methods: an alternative to standard epidemiological study designs

Open access
Petersen, Irene, Douglas, Ian, Whitaker, Heather·2016·BMJ

Abstract

The self controlled case series (SCCS) method is an epidemiological study design for which individuals act as their own control—ie, comparisons are made within individuals. Hence, only individuals who have experienced an event are included and all time invariant confounding is eliminated. The temporal association between a transient exposure and an event is estimated. SCCS was originally developed for evaluation of vaccine safety, but has since been applied in a range of settings where exact information on the size of the population at risk is lacking or identification of an appropriate comparison group is difficult—eg, for studies of adverse effects of drug treatments. We provide an overview of the SCCS method, with examples of its use, discuss limitations, assumptions, and potential biases that can arise where assumptions are not met, and provide solutions and examples of good practice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.i4515

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • We defined a separate preexposure time window, during the control time, as the period of 30 days before treatment initiation and adjusted for it.

    “We defined a separate preexposure time window, during the control time, as the period of 30 days before treatment initiation and adjusted for it.”

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 17 · Cited by 525

Authors
Petersen, I., Douglas, I., & Whitaker, H.
Affiliations
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • The Open University (GB)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Irene
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-09-12
Volume
354
Pages
i4515
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2519433651
Cited by
525
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 89 · 2023: 78 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 15 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
22.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online - ORO (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/L009005/1)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
Keywords
self-controlled case series, vaccine safety, adverse drug reactions, temporal association, study design limitations, bias, causal inference
MeSH terms
Humans, Registries, Research Design, Epidemiologic Research Design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review