Cited by 2Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic SkillsPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsRadiology practices and education

War games and diagnostic errors: Table 1

Open access
Vaughn, Valerie M, Chopra, Vineet, Howell, Joel D·2016·BMJ

Abstract

Could lessons from the cold war help reduce diagnostic error, ask Valerie Vaughn and colleagues

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.i6342

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vaughn, V. M., Chopra, V., & Howell, J. D.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2016-12-13
Volume
355
Pages
i6342
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2562234828
Cited by
2
References
1
Citations by year
2017: 2
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiology practices and education
Keywords
diagnostic errors, war games, Cold War lessons, medical error reduction, simulation-based training, patient safety
MeSH terms
Cognition, Diagnostic Errors, History, Humans, Learning, Politics, Problem Solving, Psychology, Military, Social Perception, Intuition, Emotional Intelligence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review