The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
When continuous outcomes are measured using different scales: guide for meta-analysis and interpretation
Open accessAbstract
It is common to measure continuous outcomes using different scales (eg, quality of life, severity of anxiety or depression), therefore these outcomes need to be standardized before pooling in a meta-analysis. Common methods of standardization include using the standardized mean difference, the odds ratio derived from continuous data, the minimally important difference, and the ratio of means. Other ways of making data more meaningful to end users include transforming standardized effects back to original scales and transforming odds ratios to absolute effects using an assumed baseline risk. For these methods to be valid, the scales or instruments being combined across studies need to have assessed the same or a similar construct
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
Muller, K. E., & Cohen, J. (1989) · Technometrics · doi:10.2307/1270020 · Cited by 99,603
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
The meta-analysis of response ratios in experimental ecology
Hedges, L. V., Gurevitch, J., & Curtis, P. S. (1999) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/0012-9658(1999)080[1150:tmaorr]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 4,704
Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis
(1985) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-03396-0 · Cited by 2,570
Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures
Guyatt, G. H., Osoba, D., Wu, A. W., Wyrwich, K. W., & Norman, G. R. (2002) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/77.4.371 · Cited by 1,525
Flagged first, then by citations
2 of the 28 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Wang Z, Whiteside SPH, Sim L, et al. Anxiety in Children. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2017 Aug. Report No.: 17-EHC023-EF. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK476277/
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 329
Foster, L., Foppiani, J., Patel, A., Brady, K., Adams, A. J., Choudry, U. H., & Lin, S. J. (2025) · Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2025.01.072 · Cited by 13
An umbrella review of effect size, bias, and power across meta‐analyses in emergency medicine
Parish, A. J., Yuan, D. M. K., Raggi, J. R., Omotoso, O. O., West, J. R., & Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2021) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.14312 · Cited by 15
O’Keefe, H., Shenfine, R., Brown, M., Beyer, F. R., & Rankin, J. M. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064774 · Cited by 14
Zhang, J., Jiang, N., Xu, H., Wu, Y., Cheng, S., & Liang, B. (2023) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2023.104679 · Cited by 12
Art perception is affected by negative knowledge about famous and unknown artists
Kaube, H., & Rahman, R. A. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-58697-1 · Cited by 15
“As the variables were measured on different scales (7 vs 5), the ratings were z-transformed prior to analyses 59 .”
Non-Genetic Risk Factors of Alzheimer's Disease: An Updated Umbrella Review
He, S.-Y., Su, W.-M., Wen, X.-J., Lu, S.-J., Cao, B., Yan, B., & Chen, Y.-P. (2024) · The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.14283/jpad.2024.100 · Cited by 14
“In cases involving continuous data, the standard mean difference (SMD) was converted to an odds ratio (OR) by multiplying it by π/√3 (23, 24).”
MethodEvolutions of Omni‐Channel Fulfillment Performance: An In‐Depth Case Study in Grocery Retailing
Milligan, S., Davies, I. A., Yalabik, B., Çelik, M., & Squire, B. C. (2025) · Journal of Operations Management · doi:10.1002/joom.1362 · Cited by 11
Figard, C., Messaoud, R. B., Baillieul, S., Joyeux‐Faure, M., Destors, M., Tamisier, R., Khouri, C., & Pépin, J. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103529 · Cited by 14
Foot disease and physical function in older adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Iseli, R. K., Lee, E. K., Lewis, E., Duncan, G., & Maier, A. B. (2020) · Australian Journal on Ageing · doi:10.1111/ajag.12892 · Cited by 13
Wang, X., Ding, Q., Li, T., Li, W., Yin, J., Li, Y., Li, Y., & Zhuang, W. (2023) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2023.1189034 · Cited by 11
Lactate dehydrogenase contribution to symptom persistence in long COVID: A pooled analysis
Udeh, R., Utrero‐Rico, A., Dolja‐Gore, X., Rahmati, M., McEvoy, M., & Kenna, T. (2023) · Reviews in Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/rmv.2477 · Cited by 11
“21 The degree of between ‐ study heterogeneity that could not be ascribed to sampling error was explored using Cochran's Q statistics and I 2 statistics.”
MethodMartin, F., Dahmash, D. T., Wicker, S., Glover, S.-L., Duncan, C., Anastassiou, A., Docherty, L., & Halligan, S. L. (2024) · BMJ Mental Health · doi:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300971 · Cited by 15
Is L2 grit a hierarchical construct? A meta-analysis targeting language learners
Cheng, E. H., & Cui, T. (2024) · Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development · doi:10.1080/01434632.2024.2390568 · Cited by 12
“Furthermore, previous studies indicated the necessity of aggregating research findings when multiple scales were employed to measure the same or similar concept (Murad et al. 2019).”
No gender difference in confidence or metacognitive ability in perceptual decision-making
Xue, K., Zheng, Y., Papalexandrou, C., Hoogervorst, K., Allen, M., & Rahnev, D. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.111375 · Cited by 15
Ma, S., Zhuang, W., Wang, X., Zhang, D., Wang, H., Han, Q., Ding, Q., Li, Y., Li, W., & Li, T. (2025) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2025.1495492 · Cited by 11
Virtual Reality Intervention for Fall Prevention in Older Adults: A Meta‐Analysis
Saragih, I. D., Chen, Y., Suarilah, I., Susanto, H., & Lee, B. (2025) · Journal of Nursing Scholarship · doi:10.1111/jnu.70028 · Cited by 11
El‐Kefraoui, C., Olleik, G., Chay, M.-A., Kouyoumdjian, A., Nguyen-Powanda, P., Rajabiyazdi, F., Do, U., Derksen, A., Landry, T., Amar‐Zifkin, A., et al. (2020) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035443 · Cited by 11
Chen, C., Lin, C.-H., & Kung, K.-Y. (2023) · American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation · doi:10.1097/phm.0000000000002212 · Cited by 11
“80 were set to present small, moderate, and large effect sizes, respectively.(23)”
BackgroundFong, H. P.-Y., Zhu, M.-T., Rabago, D., Reeves, K. D., Chung, V. C., & Sit, R. W. S. (2023) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2023.03.027 · Cited by 10
Saywell, I., Foreman, L. M., Child, B., Phillips‐Hughes, A. L., Collins‐Praino, L. E., & Baetu, I. (2024) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105672 · Cited by 13
“A minimum threshold of 90% agreement was settled upon for data extraction (Graham et al., 2014). directly, while other statistical parameters were standardised to correlations for pooling (Harrer et al., 2021; Murad et al., 2019).”
Ostinelli, E. G., Efthimiou, O., Luo, Y., Miguel, C., Karyotaki, E., Cuijpers, P. J., Furukawa, T. A., Salanti, G., & Cipriani, A. (2024) · Research Synthesis Methods · doi:10.1002/jrsm.1719 · Cited by 10
“4,5 The calculation of SMD from each study requires the mean difference of outcomes across treat-ment arms and the pooled standard deviation (SD).”
Kamei, T., Kawada, A., Minami, K., Takahashi, Z., Ishigaki, Y., Yamanaka, T., Yamamoto, N., Yamamoto, Y., Suzuki, Y., Watanabe, T., et al. (2024) · Geriatrics and gerontology international/Geriatrics & gerontology international · doi:10.1111/ggi.14931 · Cited by 10
“32 The risk ratio (RR) was determined for the outcome measures of dichotomous variables.”
Chen, L., & Kim, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1447734 · Cited by 10
“When outcomes were measured using varying scales with similar constructs, the standard mean difference (SMD) was used (44).”
MethodHasani, M., Khazdouz, M., Sobhani, S., Mardi, P., Riahi, S., Agh, F., Mahdavi‐Gorabi, A., Mohammadipournami, S., Gomnam, F., & Qorbani, M. (2024) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-024-01500-9 · Cited by 10
“…comprehensive meta-analysis, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated (random effect analysis, Cohen ʼ d) as an ES using the available means and SDs of metal or bio-element concentrations and sample size numbers, and then the SMD was converted to OR based on Murad et al. report [37].”
Romanet, C., Wormser, J., Cachanado, M., Santiago, M. G., Châtellier, G., Valenza, M. C., & Philippart, F. (2024) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2024.107909 · Cited by 11
PERIODONTITIS AS A RISK FACTOR FOR DEMENTIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
Kim, D., & Han, G. (2025) · Journal of Evidence Based Dental Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jebdp.2025.102094 · Cited by 11
Kang, J., Son, Y., Yim, Y., Cho, H., Kim, J., Lark, A. R. S., Mir, F. A., Kim, H. J., Park, J., Lee, H., et al. (2025) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2025.07.022 · Cited by 10
“The detailed formulas and transformation procedures are provided in Table S5 [16–18].”
Lin, D., Eaves, D. L., Franklin, J. D., Robinson, J., Binks, J., & Emerson, J. R. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1567421 · Cited by 12
“Such an analysis would invalidate typical methods of standardization (73, 121).”
González‐Gómez, L., Moral-Muñoz, J. A., Rosales‐Tristancho, A., Cuevas‐Moreno, A., Cardellat‐González, M., & Rodríguez‐Domínguez, Á. (2025) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/ejp.70090 · Cited by 12
“SMD was considered as the magnitude effect, establishing cut-off points of 0.20, 0.50, and 0.80, which can be considered to represent a small, moderate and large effect, respectively (Murad et al. 2019).”
InfluentialPedersen, M. B., Thinggaard, P., Geenen, R., Rasmussen, M. U., de Wit, M. P. T., MARCH, L. M., Mease, P. J., Choy, E., Conaghan, P. G., Simon, L. S., et al. (2021) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24816 · Cited by 11
“Summary measures and synthesis of results Continuous outcomes were summarized using standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI); to adjust for small-sample bias, a biascorrection was performed by applying Hedges’ g value (25, 26).”
MethodDing, S., Huang, X., Li, X., Shen, Y., & Yang, L. (2022) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/nicc.12811 · Cited by 10
Freire, B. L., Abreu, L. G., Costa, F. O., Cota, L. O. M., & Lima, R. P. E. (2023) · Lasers in Medical Science · doi:10.1007/s10103-023-03782-6 · Cited by 10
“When the studies incorporated into a meta-analysis used different scales for the measurement of the same outcome, the standardized mean difference (SMD) was provided [19].”
Bai, J., Yin, X., Li, J., Li, J., Niu, Y., Li, Z., Li, J., & Zhou, Y. (2023) · Clinical Transplantation · doi:10.1111/ctr.15119 · Cited by 10
Freeman, S. C., Sutton, A. J., & Cooper, N. J. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.010 · Cited by 10
Alogaiel, D. M., Alsuwaylihi, A., Alotaibi, M. S., Macdonald, I. A., & Lobo, D. N. (2025) · Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2025.01.005 · Cited by 12
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Radiation Dose Reduction Studies in Pediatric Head CT
He, K., Boukind, A., Sanka, S. A., Ribaudo, J. G., Chryssofos, S., Skolnick, G. B., Yaeger, L., Thomas, A. M., Mian, A., & Patel, K. B. (2025) · American Journal of Neuroradiology · doi:10.3174/ajnr.a8730 · Cited by 9
López‐Medina, C., Capelusnik, D., Webers, C., den Bosch, F. E. V., Boonen, A. E. R. C. H., Carron, P., Moltó, A., & Ramiro, S. (2025) · RMD Open · doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2025-005525 · Cited by 9
“With a constant number of observations per outcome measure, a higher χ 2 indicates better discriminatory capacity.”
Luo, L., Dimitrovski, M., Wise, T., & Iniesta, R. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106309 · Cited by 10
“Although cross-scale comparison research on MDD and AD exists (Murad et al., 2019) and has shown its cross-measurement equivalence and communicability (Gonz ´ alez and Jenkins, 2014), a promising direction for future exploration lies in moving beyond specific symptom clusters to consider…”
Zang, W., Fang, M., Xiao, N., Wu, J., Zhang, Q., & Mao, X. (2025) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155251385219 · Cited by 9
“30 Finally, the exercise doses at which these effects were achieved were predicted for both overall and modality-speci fi c interventions.”
Nong, K., Shi, Q., Xie, X., Wang, Y., Agarwal, A., Guyatt, G. H., Zhang, H., Gao, Y., Khunti, K., le Roux, C. W., et al. (2026) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj-2026-372161 · Cited by 15
Sun, T., Wang, K., Li, L., Yan, M., Zou, L., Zhang, M., Yang, S., Wu, J. H., & Liu, J. (2023) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2023.1275452 · Cited by 9
Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality for ICU Patients with Heart FailurePreprint
Zhang, J., Li, H., Ashrafi, N., Yu, Z., Placencia, G., & Pishgar, M. (2024) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2024.06.25.24309448 · Cited by 11
“The Variance Inflation Factor (VIF) was calculated to prevent multicollinearity in continuous features that could cause high standard errors in the prediction model (Murad et al. [24] and Lafi et al. [25]).”
MethodRobledo, D. A., Prudente, M. S., Aguja, S. E., & Iwata, H. (2023) · Current Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.crtox.2023.100131 · Cited by 8
Lane, M., Miao, T., & Turgeon, R. D. (2024) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-023-08582-w · Cited by 8
Chaudhry, F., Morgan, S. B., Kruse, C. C., Wolfstadt, J. I., & Ekhtiari, S. (2024) · Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · doi:10.5435/jaaos-d-23-01130 · Cited by 8
Li, Y., Hu, Y., Pozzato, I., Arora, M., Schoffl, J., McBain, C., Middleton, J. W., & Craig, A. R. (2024) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2024.0032 · Cited by 8
Ding, S., Wang, Q., Fu, X., Huang, X., Liao, L., & Zhang, Y. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2025.105031 · Cited by 8
Capelusnik, D., López‐Medina, C., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Landewé, R., Dougados, M., Sieper, J., Moltó, A., & Ramiro, S. (2025) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.02.011 · Cited by 8
Suebkinorn, O., Ramos, J. S., Grace, S. L., Gebremichael, L. G., Bulamu, N. B., de Plaza, M. A. P., Dafny, H. A., Pearson, V., Bulto, L. N., Chen, R. T., et al. (2025) · JBI Evidence Synthesis · doi:10.11124/jbies-24-00457 · Cited by 9
Hussain, N., Brull, R., Freedenberg, A. T., Vannabouathong, C., D'Souza, R. S., Havlik, S., Beachy, P., Gunawan, A., Weaver, T. E., McIsaac, D. I., et al. (2025) · Anesthesiology · doi:10.1097/aln.0000000000005607 · Cited by 8
Liang, M.-Y., Cui, J.-R., Fan, X., Zhang, J., Liu, X.-L., & Liu, D.-G. (2025) · International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances · doi:10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100470 · Cited by 9
“Effect sizes were calculated as weighted mean differences for identical assessment scales or standardized mean differences for heterogeneous instruments, presented with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) (Murad et al., 2019).”
Tan, X., Zou, H., Guo, M., Liu, J., Huang, X., Yu, R., Liu, X., & Qin, C. (2026) · Journal of sport and health science/Journal of Sport and Health Science · doi:10.1016/j.jshs.2026.101125 · Cited by 8
“Minimally important differences (MID), a key bridge between statistical and clinical significance, 28 translates standardized mean differences (SMDs) in meta-analysis 29 to define the minimum meaningful exercise dose.”
Romand, X., Adeline, F., Dalecky, M., Pflimlin, A., Bellier, A., Barone‐Rochette, G., Wendling, D., Gaudin, P., Claudepierre, P., Dougados, M., et al. (2022) · Joint Bone Spine · doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2022.105375 · Cited by 8
Cope, A. G., Narasimhulu, D. M., Khan, Z., VanBuren, W. M., Welch, B. T., & Burnett, T. L. (2020) · Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders · doi:10.1177/2284026520906060 · Cited by 8
Association between formal thought disorder and cannabis use: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Argote, M., Sescousse, G., Brunelin, J., Fakra, É., Nourredine, M., & Rolland, B. (2022) · Schizophrenia · doi:10.1038/s41537-022-00286-0 · Cited by 8
Wang, X., Ding, Q., Li, Y., Li, T., Li, Y., Yin, J., & Zhuang, W. (2024) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2024.1374395 · Cited by 8
Hu, Y., Li, Y., Leung, A. Y. M., Li, J., Mei, X., Montayre, J., Tao, R., & Yorke, J. (2025) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1177/02692155241313174 · Cited by 7
Badriyah, F. L., Suarilah, I., Tarihoran, D. E. T. A. U., Saragih, I. D., & Lee, B. (2025) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.70036 · Cited by 7
Lymphadenectomy or sentinel node biopsy for the management of endometrial cancer
Moffatt, J., Webster, K. E., Dwan, K. M., Frost, J., & Morrison, J. (2025) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd015786.pub2 · Cited by 9
Effectiveness of kinesio taping for chronic stroke patients: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Fandim, J. V., Amaral, A. L., Andrade, L. M., Almeida, L., Giangiardi, V. F., Oshima, R. K. A., de Oliveira, C. Q., da Silva, M. L., & Saragiotto, B. T. (2023) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638288.2023.2241822 · Cited by 7
“We planned to convert different outcome measures used by studies into a specific scale [40] if necessary.”
MethodDjorwé, S., Bousfiha, A., Nzoyikorera, N., Nyandwi, J., Kawthar, B., & Malki, A. (2024) · Biomedicine · doi:10.37796/2211-8039.1429 · Cited by 8
“For continuous variables for which SMD has been calculated, the odd ratio is determined according to the equation: ln (OR) ¼ p / √ 3 X SMD [13].”
MethodSeptorhinoplasty and the Late Impact on Olfactory Function: A Review and Meta-analysis
de Sousa, F. A., Santos, M., Correia, J. T., Pinto, A. N., Meireles, L., & Ferreira, M. G. (2022) · Facial Plastic Surgery · doi:10.1055/a-1979-8636 · Cited by 7
Chen, Y., Sarnthiyakul, S., Michel, S., Wu, C., Hauner, H., Ehrenstein, O. S. V., Liu, J., & Chen, L. (2025) · Nutrition Journal · doi:10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w · Cited by 8
“To increase interpretability, transforming back to a familiar scale was done by multiplying the SMC in PA by the pooled standard deviations of change in studies using the desired original scale and among the largest/ most representative of the primary studies [69, 70].”
Reveyaz, M.-A., Peyronnel, C., Boëté, Q., Fournier, J., Arnaud, C., Belaïdi, E., Harki, O., Pépin, J., Khouri, C., Faury, G., et al. (2026) · Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity · doi:10.1155/omcl/9967028 · Cited by 7
“An SMD > 0.8 was considered large, 0.5 – 0.8 moderate, and 0.2 – 0.5 small [22].”
InfluentialComposite materials combined with stem cells promote kidney repair and regeneration
Tian, H., Wu, L., Qin, H., Li, X., Zhao, X., Zhao, W., Xue, F., Zhao, S., Li, L., & Zeng, W. (2024) · Composites Part B Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111278 · Cited by 6
Silva, H. V. C., Lunardi, A. C., Pinto, A. C. P. N., de Macedo, J. R. F. F., & dos Santos, E. D. C. (2024) · Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery · doi:10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0319 · Cited by 6
“Continuous variables were analyzed using the weighted mean differences (MD) and for studies that evaluated the same outcome with different instruments, we used the standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) [23] .”
MethodExperimenting to increase the effectiveness of a national campaign on hygiene behavior in Tanzania
Aunger, R. V., Coville, A., Kwezi, L., Mwakitalima, A., Mwambuli, K., Reichert, A. R., & Sansonetti, J. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-024-67144-0 · Cited by 6
Fukumori, M., Kikuchi, T., Zhou, Y., Hattori, S., & Kudo, T. (2024) · Acta Neuropsychiatrica · doi:10.1017/neu.2024.45 · Cited by 7
Movement Awareness Therapies in Eating Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis
Bravo, C., Hernández‐García, D., Trinidad‐Fernández, M., Badia, G., Solé, S., & Serrano, J. C. E. (2024) · Nursing and Health Sciences · doi:10.1111/nhs.13181 · Cited by 5
Corrêa, M. G., Lobão, T. A., Bahia, G. M. D. C., Sanches, É. M., Gomes, R. D. C., de Queiroz, J. H. M., Monteiro, M. C., & Bahia, C. P. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309259 · Cited by 5
Raudasoja, A., Parpia, S., Mustonen, J. M. J., Vernooij, R. W. M., Falkenbach, P., Aoki, Y., Барчук, А. А., Blanker, M. H., Cartwright, R., Crowder, K., et al. (2025) · BMJ Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2025-001343 · Cited by 5
Sattar, A. A., Qaiser, A., Kausar, H., Aqil, S., Mudassar, R., Manzoor, S., & Ashraf, J. (2024) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2024.1303115 · Cited by 5
Vitamin D Levels in Patients with Noninfectious Uveitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Amaral, D. C., Takahashi, R., de Moraes, H. M. V., Rodrigues, M. P. M., Filho, A. A. C., de Moraes, H. V., & Louzada, R. N. (2024) · Ocular Immunology and Inflammation · doi:10.1080/09273948.2024.2367676 · Cited by 5
“18 A statistical significance was acknowledged when p-value <0.05.”
InfluentialMeta-analysis of continuous outcomes: a user’s guide for analysis and interpretation
Siedler, M. R., Mustafa, R. A., Lin, L., Morgan, R. L., Falck-Ytter, Y. T., Dahm, P., Sultan, S., & Murad, M. H. (2024) · BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113031 · Cited by 5
Self-citationBath, P. M., Phan, E. P., Clay, G., Dawson, J., Malhotra, P., Howard, R. J., Pal, S., Wardlaw, J. M., Quinn, T., & Macleod, M. R. (2024) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.157890.1 · Cited by 4
Bao, R.-H., Zhao, N., Jiang, X., Cong, Z.-H., Liu, J., Kang, L., Chen, Y.-H., Sun, J., Xing, W.-Y., Liu, J.-X., et al. (2025) · EClinicalMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103277 · Cited by 6
“32 Furthermore, each analysis was assessed separately if an article performed different meta-analyses on more than one outcome or among various populations.”
Arora, N. K., Donath, L., Owen, P. J., Miller, C. T., Kaczorowski, S., Saueressig, T., Pedder, H., Mundell, N. L., Tagliaferri, S. D., Diwan, A. D., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2024-002108 · Cited by 4
Sermsaksasithorn, P., Nopsopon, T., Samuthpongtorn, C., Chotirosniramit, K., & Pongpirul, K. (2025) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1609667 · Cited by 5
Efthymiadis, A., Bastounis, A., Liu, L. L., Bourlaki, M., Spinos, D., & Tsikopoulos, K. (2024) · Journal of Diabetes & Metabolic Disorders · doi:10.1007/s40200-024-01492-6 · Cited by 4
“This was performed using pre-intervention standard deviation (SD) estimates from the largest observational study identified [42, 43].”
Zeng, M., Yi, M., Yin, H. M., Zheng, T., & Peng, Y. (2025) · Sleep and Biological Rhythms · doi:10.1007/s41105-025-00595-8 · Cited by 4
“Specifically, the MDs between intervention and con-trol groups in each study was divided by the pooled standard deviation, resulting in SMDs suitable for meta-analysis [28].”
Retiring the Term “Weighted Mean Difference” in Contemporary Evidence Synthesis
Lin, L., Xing, X., Han, W., & Tong, J. (2025) · Cochrane Evidence Synthesis and Methods · doi:10.1002/cesm.70051 · Cited by 4
Self-citationCapelusnik, D., Medina, C. L., van der Heijde, D. M. F. M., Aletaha, D., Smolen, J. S., Moltó, A., & Ramiro, S. (2025) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1016/j.ard.2025.08.027 · Cited by 4
Zeng, L., Yao, L., Wang, Y., Han, M. A., Granholm, A., Nampo, F. K., Najafabadi, B. T., Ni, X., Zhang, L., Devji, T., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2023.03.027 · Cited by 4
Rees, J. L. C., Saunders, R., Krynicki, C. R., Belli, A., Ahmed, Z., Pietro, V. D., & Stevens, A. R. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2025.1546080 · Cited by 5
Zhang, S., Guo, Q., Huang, K., & Zhu, H. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0319758 · Cited by 4
Antibody Response to BNT162b2 Vaccine in Immune Modifiers–Treated Psoriatic Patients
Pavlotsky, F., Segal, Z. I., & Barzilai, A. (2021) · Journal of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis · doi:10.1177/24755303211056059 · Cited by 4
Kristensen, C. B., Ide, M., Forbes, A., & Asimakopoulou, K. G. (2022) · Frontiers in Oral Health · doi:10.3389/froh.2022.1068905 · Cited by 8
“The different assessments of self-reported psychological or behavioural outcomes pose an issue to the generalisability of the effectiveness of the interventions due to different signalling questions, directions, and units (52).”
BackgroundSaywell, I., Child, B., Foreman, L. M., Collins‐Praino, L. E., & Baetu, I. (2023) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.14967 · Cited by 4
Green, W. M., Raut, S. B., James, F., Benedek, D. M., Ursano, R. J., & Johnson, L. R. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.08.17.23293955 · Cited by 4
Ologunowa, A. J., Otoo, M. N., Caffrey, A. R., Buchanan, A. L., Eze, J. U., & Vyas, A. (2025) · Journal of Pain & Palliative Care Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1080/15360288.2025.2496526 · Cited by 3
“To account for differences in measurement scales, we rescaled all outcomes reported on non-100-point scales to a 0–100 scale and used SMD as the effect measure, enabling the combination of studies assessing the same outcome across different scales (52–54).”
Gaskin, J., Li, W. W., van Eijk, L., & Sarnyai, Z. (2025) · Police Practice and Research · doi:10.1080/15614263.2025.2506647 · Cited by 8
“Firstly, the measurement tools used in the included studies needed to specifically measure the intended outcome (Deeks et al., 2024; Murad et al., 2019).”
Bai, J., Zheng, Z., Cao, J., Ji, L., Zhang, J., Yang, Y., & Guo, Q. (2025) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2025.2522971 · Cited by 3
Wolfe, D. M., Hamel, C., Berard, J. A., Veroniki, A. A., Skidmore, B., Kanji, S., Rabheru, K., McGee, S. F., Forbes, L. M., Machado, I., et al. (2025) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers17213430 · Cited by 5
Mehari, A., & Zeleke, S. (2025) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105186 · Cited by 3
Keykha, E., Hajisadeghi, S., & Heidari, M. T. (2025) · BMC Oral Health · doi:10.1186/s12903-025-07334-y · Cited by 3
“This variability arises from several factors, including different methods of DFA measurement and the scales used, which can affect results and make data pooling in meta-analyses more difficult [3, 69, 70].”
Vermazen, K., Niblett, A., Thomson, C., & Tebbett, A. (2026) · Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery · doi:10.1007/s00402-025-06139-6 · Cited by 3
Miao, M., Xu, Y., Yang, Y., Li, P., Jia, M., Wen, Z., Yu, M., Zhang, J., & Gu, J. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057394 · Cited by 3
Serafín-Fabián, J. I., Moreno‐Godínez, M. E., Flores‐Alfaro, E., Parra‐Rojas, I., Rojas‐García, A. E., Campos-Viguri, G. E., Cahua‐Pablo, J. Á., & Ramírez‐Vargas, M. A. (2023) · Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.etap.2023.104279 · Cited by 3
McGowan, L. J., John, D. A., Kenny, R. P. W., Joyes, E. C., Adams, E. A., Shabaninejad, H., Richmond, C., Beyer, F. R., Landes, D. P., Watt, R. G., et al. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0298885 · Cited by 3
Brust, L., Schmidt‐Wolf, I. G. H., & Weigl, M. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307831 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Murad, M. H., Wang, Z., Chu, H., & Lin, L.
- Affiliations
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Florida State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Murad, Mohammad Hassan
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2019-01-22
- Volume
- 364
- Pages
- k4817
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- 0959-8138
- PMC
- PMC6890471
- OpenAlex
- W2912626077
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 65 · 2025: 71 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 15.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (U01DK106786)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R21LM012744, R21LM012197)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
- Keywords
- scale standardization, continuous outcomes, meta-analysis, standardized mean difference, odds ratio, minimally important difference, ratio of means, baseline risk, quality of life, anxiety, depression
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Anxiety, Child, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Decision Making, Depression, Female, Humans, Parents, Quality of Life, Reference Standards, Severity of Illness Index, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Outcome Assessment, Health Care
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review