Covid-19: Disproportionate impact on ethnic minority healthcare workers will be explored by government
Open accessAbstract
Preoperative localization of the parathyroids using 99mTc-sestamibi scanning has not yet been established as a routine diagnostic procedure for primary hyperparathyroidism. Several studies have demonstrated a variable degree of accuracy (70%–98%) in asymptomatic patients. Methods: We evaluated the accuracy of this technique in 64 patients who underwent scanning between January 2000 and January 2005 according to the clinical manifestations of the disease. Results: The study included 25 asymptomatic patients (group I), 18 nephrolithiasis patients without overt bone disease (group II), and 21 patients with severe bone involvement and osteitis fibrosa cystica (group III). Mean serum calcium in groups I, II, and III was 10.98 ± 0.02, 11.32 ± 0.17, and 13.35 ± 0.35 mg/dL, respectively. Mean serum parathyroid hormone in groups I, II, and III was 135.45 ± 13.50, 165.85 ± 15.06, and 579.6 ± 628.4 pg/mL, respectively. The 99mTc-sestamibi scan results were positive in 64% of the patients in group I, in 83% of those in group II, and in 100% of those in group III. Of the patients with severe bone disease, 70% showed increased uptake on the initial images, whereas in the other groups, increased uptake was seen only on the delayed images, as expected. Conclusion: Our data show a high degree of accuracy for the use of 99mTc-sestamibi scanning as a localizing procedure in severe primary hyperparathyroidism.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The COVID-19 outbreak has disproportionately affected some communities, such as Black and minority ethnic groups, more than others.
“This outbreak has also disproportionately affected some communities, such as Black and minority ethnic groups, more than others 144 .”
From Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19 (2020) · cites this paper as [144]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital technologies in the public-health response to COVID-19
Budd, J., Miller, B. S., Manning, E. M., Lampos, V., Zhuang, M., Edelstein, M., Rees, G., Emery, V. C., Stevens, M. M., Keegan, N., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1011-4 · Cited by 1,195 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rimmer, A.
- Affiliations
- BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Rimmer, Abi
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-04-17
- Volume
- 369
- Pages
- m1562
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3016501507
- Cited by
- 62
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 24
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Challenges
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments
- Keywords
- COVID-19 pandemic, racial disparities, primary hyperparathyroidism, parathyroid localization, diagnostic accuracy, asymptomatic patients, kidney stones, osteitis fibrosa cystica, bone disease
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review