The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Patient and public involvement in covid-19 policy making
Abstract
Absent in the early stages of the pandemic, it must now move centre stage
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Local government, non-governmental organisations, and citizen groups nevertheless ' took the lead in providing information, advice and support for their communities ' (Richards and Scowcroft, 2020).”
From Risk Governance, State Capacity, and Critical Human Security: Evolution of Risk Governance in Response to Systemic Risk in the UK and South Korea (2025) · cites this paper as Richards and Scowcroft, 2020
In the citing paper
“Decisions had to be made fast, but policy makers ' choice of expert advisers excluded those with expertise rooted in lived experience -patients, families, and frontline health and social care professionals.”
From Risk Governance, State Capacity, and Critical Human Security: Evolution of Risk Governance in Response to Systemic Risk in the UK and South Korea (2025) · cites this paper as Richards and Scowcroft (2020)
In the citing paper
“According to Richards and Scowcroft (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic saw statutory policy commitments to patient and public involvement and shared decision making abandoned.”
From Risk Governance, State Capacity, and Critical Human Security: Evolution of Risk Governance in Response to Systemic Risk in the UK and South Korea (2025) · cites this paper as Richards and Scowcroft (2020)
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-002909 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-9566.13115 · DOI
- Dijk SW Duijzer E Wienold M . The role of active patient involvement in undergraduate medical education: a systematic review. BMJ Open forthcoming.
- Coproduction of research. Nature special issue 3 Oct 2018. vol 362. https://www.nature.com/collections/nnqkvntryl
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dewa, L. H., Crandell, C., Choong, E., Jaques, J., Bottle, A., Kilkenny, C., Lawrence-Jones, A., Di Simplicio, M., Nicholls, D., & Aylin, P. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.01.009 · Cited by 78
Kim, E., Oh, Y., & Kennett, P. (2025) · Social Policy and Society · doi:10.1017/s1474746425000144 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Richards, T., & Scowcroft, H.
- Affiliations
- BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Richards, Tessa
- ORCID
- Scowcroft, Henry
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2020-07-01
- Volume
- 370
- Pages
- m2575
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3039096020
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 7
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Public Health Policies and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
- Keywords
- patient and public involvement, COVID-19 pandemic, health policy development, pandemic response, citizen participation
- MeSH terms
- Betacoronavirus, Decision Making, Shared, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Community Participation, Health Policy, Humans, Patient Advocacy, Patient Participation, Pneumonia, Viral, Policy Making, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
