Cited by 38SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Covid-19: South Africa pauses use of Oxford vaccine after study casts doubt on efficacy against variant

Abstract

Covid-19: South Africa pauses use of Oxford vaccine after study casts doubt on efficacy against variant Elisabeth MahaseRollout of the Oxford-AstraZeneca covid-19 vaccine in South Africa has been paused after a study in 2000 healthy and young volunteers reported that it did not protect against mild and moderate disease caused by the new variant (501Y.V2) that emerged there.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.n372

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As new variants of the virus regularly emerge, coronavirus is here to stay, and further lockdown/restrictions are likely despite the roll out of the vaccination programme.

    “As new variants of the virus regularly emerge (e.g. Delta, Omicron), the expectation is that coronavirus is here to stay (Mahase, 2021), and further lockdown/restrictions are likely despite the roll out of the vaccination programme.”

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 10.1136/bmj.n296 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1136/bmj.n86 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mahase, E.
Affiliations
BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
Corresponding author
Mahase, Elisabeth
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2021-02-08
Volume
372
Pages
n372
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128959418
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 20
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine, vaccine efficacy, South Africa, young healthy volunteers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review