The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Abortion: UN is urged to intervene in “human rights crisis” in US after ending of rights
Open accessAbstract
Abortion: UN is urged to intervene in "human
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Human rights experts note that allowing women and girls bodily autonomy is essential for ensuring non-discrimination and ensuring the dignity and equality of people who can become pregnant (Looi, 2023).”
From The role (and limits) of developmental neuroscience in determining adolescents' autonomy rights: The case for reproductive and voting rights (2024) · cites this paper as Looi, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Maslowsky, J., Buss, E., & Wray-Lake, L. (2024) · Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2024.101435 · Cited by 8
“Human rights experts note that allowing women and girls bodily autonomy is essential for ensuring non-discrimination and ensuring the dignity and equality of people who can become pregnant (Looi, 2023).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Looi, M.-K.
- Affiliations
- BMJ Group (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Looi, Mun-Keat
- Venue
- BMJ
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2023-03-03
- Volume
- 380
- Pages
- p521
- ISSN
- 1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4323066818
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- www.bmj.com/company/legal-information/terms-conditions/legal-information/tdm-licencepolicy (tdm)
- Locations
- BMJ (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › International Human Rights and Reproductive Law
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Keywords
- abortion, United Nations, human rights, abortion rights, international intervention
- MeSH terms
- Abortion, Spontaneous, Abortion, Induced, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, United Nations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
