Cited by 50Diabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes Management and ResearchPharmacology and Obesity Treatment

Real-world use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: pooled analysis of data from four SURE studies by baseline characteristic subgroups

Open access
Yale, Jean-François, Bodholdt, Ulrik, Catarig, Andrei-Mircea, Catrina, Sergiu, Clark, Alice, Ekberg, Neda Rajamand, Erhan, Umut, Holmes, Patrick +5 more·2022·BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care

Abstract

Introduction: This post hoc pooled analysis of four real-world studies (SURE Canada, Denmark/Sweden, Switzerland and UK) aimed to characterize the use of once-weekly (OW) semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Research design and methods: The Semaglutide Real-world Evidence (SURE) studies had a duration of ~30 weeks. Changes in glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) and body weight (BW) were analyzed for the overall population and the following baseline subgroups: GLP-1RA-naïve/GLP-1RA switchers; body mass index <25/≥25–<30/≥30–<35/≥35 kg/m 2 ; age <65/≥65 years; HbA 1c <7%/≥7–≤8%/>8–≤9%/>9%; T2D duration <5/≥5–<10/≥10 years. Data for patients achieving treatment targets were analyzed in the overall population and the baseline HbA 1c ≥7% subgroup. Results: Of 1212 patients, 960 were GLP-1RA-naïve and 252 had switched to semaglutide from another GLP-1RA. In the overall population, HbA 1c was reduced from baseline to end of study (EOS) by –1.1% point and BW by –4.7 kg; changes were significant for all subgroups. There were significantly larger reductions of HbA 1c and BW in GLP-1RA-naïve versus GLP-1RA switchers and larger reductions in HbA 1c for patients with higher versus lower baseline HbA 1c . At EOS, 52.6% of patients in the overall population achieved HbA 1c <7%. No new safety concerns were identified in any of the completed SURE studies. Conclusions: In this pooled analysis, patients with T2D initiating OW semaglutide showed significant improvements from baseline to EOS in HbA 1c and BW across various baseline subgroups, including patients previously treated with a GLP-1RA other than semaglutide, supporting OW semaglutide use in clinical practice. Trail registration numbers: NCT03457012 ; NCT03631186 ; NCT03648281 ; NCT03876015 .

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002619

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies reporting results in an 'as-started' approach found considerably lower weight-loss effectiveness.

    “Importantly, the weight‐loss effectiveness of GLP‐1RA was similar to what has been observed in trials when focusing on the subgroup of adherent patients who consistently took their prescribed GLP‐1RA, for example, at 12 months follow‐up, 50 , 53 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 61 whereas studies reporting results in an ‘as‐started’ approach found considerably lower effectiveness. 52 , 59 , 63 , 66”

    From Real‐world evidence on the utilization, clinical and comparative effectiveness, and adverse effects of newer <scp>GLP</scp> ‐ <scp>1RA</scp> ‐based weight‐loss therapies (2025) · cites this paper as [66]

    The Methods (Study design; Post hoc analysis, page unavailable) show that body weight was analyzed in the full analysis set of patients who initiated semaglutide, rather than only those who completed treatment. The Discussion (page unavailable) says weight reduction in the SURE studies was comparable to that in the SUSTAIN trials (−4.7 kg versus −3.5 to −6.4 kg), contrary to the claim of considerably lower effectiveness. The paper does not report a direct comparison with adherent patients. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. [1]Artasensi A, Pedretti A, Vistoli G, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of multi-target drugs. Molecules 2020; 25: 1987. 10.3390/molecules25081987 PMC7221535 32340373 · DOI
  2. [3]Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2018; 41: 2669– 701. 10.2337/dci18-0033 30291106 PMC6245208 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [5]del Cañizo-Gómez FJ, Moreira-Andrés MN. Cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2004; 65: 125– 33. 10.1016/j.diabres.2003.12.002 15223224 · DOI
  4. [6]Prasad-Reddy L, Isaacs D. A clinical review of GLP-1 receptor agonists: efficacy and safety in diabetes and beyond. Drugs Context 2015; 4: 212283. 10.7573/dic.212283 26213556 PMC4509428 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Lau J, Bloch P, Schäffer L, et al. Discovery of the once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue semaglutide. J Med Chem 2015; 58: 7370– 80. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00726 26308095 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [11]Sorli C, Harashima S-I, Tsoukas GM, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5: 251– 60. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X 28110911 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [13]Ahmann AJ, Capehorn M, Charpentier G, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus exenatide ER in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): a 56-week, open-label, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2018; 41: 258– 66. 10.2337/dc17-0417 29246950 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [14]Aroda VR, Bain SC, Cariou B, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus once-daily insulin glargine as add-on to metformin (with or without sulfonylureas) in insulin-naive patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 4): a randomised, open-label, parallel-group, multicentre, multinational, phase 3A trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017; 5: 355– 66. 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30085-2 28344112 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [16]Pratley RE, Aroda VR, Lingvay I, et al. Semaglutide versus dulaglutide once weekly in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 7): a randomised, open-label, phase 3B trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018; 6: 275– 86. 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30024-X 29397376 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [17]Lingvay I, Catarig A-M, Frias JP, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide versus daily canagliflozin as add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 8): a double-blind, phase 3b, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2019; 7: 834– 44. 10.1016/S2213-8587(19)30311-0 31540867 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [19]Capehorn MS, Catarig A-M, Furberg JK, et al. Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg vs once-daily liraglutide 1.2 mg as add-on to 1-3 oral antidiabetic drugs in subjects with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 10). Diabetes Metab 2020; 46: 100– 9. 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.101117 31539622 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [20]Blonde L, Khunti K, Harris SB, et al. Interpretation and impact of real-world clinical data for the practicing clinician. Adv Ther 2018; 35: 1763– 74. 10.1007/s12325-018-0805-y 30357570 PMC6223979 · DOI
  13. [21]Yale J-F, Catarig A-M, Grau K, et al. Use of once-weekly semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes in routine clinical practice: results from the SURE Canada multicentre, prospective, observational study. Diabetes Obes Metab 2021; 23: 2269– 78. 10.1111/dom.14468 34142429 PMC9291287 · DOI
  14. [25]World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA 2013; 310: 2191– 4. 10.1001/jama.2013.281053 24141714 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [26]Public Policy Committee, International Society of Pharmacoepidemiology. Guidelines for good pharmacoepidemiology practice (GPP). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2016; 25: 2– 10. 10.1002/pds.3891 26537534 · DOI
  16. [27]Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care 1992; 30: 473– 83. 1593914
  17. [29]Lingvay I, Kirk AR, Lophaven S, et al. 954-P: GLP-1–experienced patients switching to once-weekly semaglutide in a real-world setting (EXPERT study). Diabetes 2020; 69: 954-P. 10.2337/db20-954-P 33594582 PMC7947062 · DOI
  18. [30]Hepprich M, Zillig D, Florian-Reynoso MA, et al. Switch-to-Semaglutide study (STS-Study): a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12: 943– 54. 10.1007/s13300-021-01016-y 33615400 PMC7947039 · DOI
  19. [31]Goncalves E, Bell DS. Efficacy of semaglutide versus liraglutide in clinical practice. Diabetes Metab 2020; 46: 515– 7. 10.1016/j.diabet.2019.10.001 31606525 · DOI
  20. [32]Jain AB, Kanters S, Khurana R, et al. Real-world effectiveness analysis of switching from liraglutide or dulaglutide to semaglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: the retrospective REALISE-DM Study. Diabetes Ther 2021; 12: 527– 36. 10.1007/s13300-020-00984-x 33367981 PMC7846659 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [33]Edelman SV, Polonsky WH. Type 2 diabetes in the real world: the elusive nature of glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 1425– 32. 10.2337/dc16-1974 28801473 · DOI
  22. [35]Brown RE, Bech PG, Aronson R. Semaglutide once weekly in people with type 2 diabetes: real-world analysis of the Canadian LMC diabetes registry (SPARE study). Diabetes Obes Metab 2020; 22: 2013– 20. 10.1111/dom.14117 32538541 PMC7689820 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yale, J.-F., Bodholdt, U., Catarig, A.-M., Catrina, S., Clark, A., Ekberg, N. R., Erhan, U., Holmes, P., Knudsen, S. T., Liutkus, J., Sathyapalan, T., Schultes, B., & Rudofsky, G.
Affiliations
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Kastruplægerne, Kastrup, Denmark
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • St. George’s Medical Practice, Darlington, UK
  • Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
  • Joanne F. Liutkus Medicine Professional Corporation, Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
  • University of Hull (GB)
  • Metabolic Center St. Gallen, friendlyDocs, St. Gallen, Switzerland
  • Clinic for Endocrinology and Metabolic Diseases, Cantonal Hospital Olten, Olten, Switzerland
Corresponding author
Yale, Jean-François
Venue
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2022-04
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
e002619
ISSN
2052-4897 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4224323287
Cited by
50
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Novo Nordisk A/S (Not applicable)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
Keywords
semaglutide, type 2 diabetes, GLP-1 receptor agonists, weekly dosing, HbA1c, weight loss, real-world evidence, baseline HbA1c, body mass index, treatment goals, drug safety
MeSH terms
Semaglutide, Aged, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glucagon-Like Peptides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review